Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Community Meta
Introductions & Welcomes
Yeats
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dimension-1hacker" data-source="post: 197795" data-attributes="member: 11791"><p>I do not perceive any subjective benifite feeling negative emotions, most peoples opinions are determined by what they were told to believe and don't question the belief system which not understanding that belief system which usually is "I feel its true", and a few sentence statement without any proof after. They fail to recognise that every word is defined by more words and that something that does not have a definition does not mean anything, therefore there is no end to the reasons provided to prove something is correct. I recognise based off scientific studies that proves this, and others interactions that all of the above is correct within this reality. Also prove your statements, most of every society historically are tin foils and most government conspiracies where admited to be correct by the government, for example mkultra, the fbi posioning alchohol, the iranian cou, and so on. There is a large amount of data showing that most politicians and both mostly right media partially is bankrolled by big oil and forein govs, and some left media are just mostly caused to be corperate and 1% puppets anyways, a quick google search would show millions of articles, books, and fact checking websites that show this type of corruption exists.</p><p></p><p>Every reason needs a reason to be true or there are no reasons for something to be true, therefore if you provide a finite amount of reasons there will always be an end to the reasons you can statement and reasons that those reasons are true; hence there is no reason for the sum of the reasons to be correct. Correct tautology? Do you consider nihilism, the statement "question everything", obsurdism, and simulation theory magical, and if not then your methods of determination are both logical and not closeminded and do not believe things only because of a particular society you grew up in and don't recognise that. Rebuke? Harte usually qoutes scientific theories but science is a type of philosophy and is not the be it end all of logical thought. Scientific theories are determined by perceived visual information but science does not prove the information seen by the consciousness is accurate, logic is understood by other types of philosophies.</p><p></p><p>The poem you wrote or qoutes or some of each does not apply to every person, I trained myself to think logically in other words to question everything and not care about silly social norms; an intellectual and an alpha male rather then an ignorant and a beta or alpha. The poem matiphorically does apply to what is usually always occurred, occurring, and what will occur in the future based off the data I know about; articles, scientific studies, and so on. great poem.</p><p></p><p>Interesting that around a day after a potential cause some accounts are created, and that people that created the accounts posted logical statements.</p><p></p><p>a riddle: what goes around and around but does not stop unless acted on, never moving away from its parts, always going forward at the gong of a practical bell.</p><p>you are a genius of you can solve that. Nobody that I know of has through out human history solved that.</p><p>I am not a tin foil</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dimension-1hacker, post: 197795, member: 11791"] I do not perceive any subjective benifite feeling negative emotions, most peoples opinions are determined by what they were told to believe and don't question the belief system which not understanding that belief system which usually is "I feel its true", and a few sentence statement without any proof after. They fail to recognise that every word is defined by more words and that something that does not have a definition does not mean anything, therefore there is no end to the reasons provided to prove something is correct. I recognise based off scientific studies that proves this, and others interactions that all of the above is correct within this reality. Also prove your statements, most of every society historically are tin foils and most government conspiracies where admited to be correct by the government, for example mkultra, the fbi posioning alchohol, the iranian cou, and so on. There is a large amount of data showing that most politicians and both mostly right media partially is bankrolled by big oil and forein govs, and some left media are just mostly caused to be corperate and 1% puppets anyways, a quick google search would show millions of articles, books, and fact checking websites that show this type of corruption exists. Every reason needs a reason to be true or there are no reasons for something to be true, therefore if you provide a finite amount of reasons there will always be an end to the reasons you can statement and reasons that those reasons are true; hence there is no reason for the sum of the reasons to be correct. Correct tautology? Do you consider nihilism, the statement "question everything", obsurdism, and simulation theory magical, and if not then your methods of determination are both logical and not closeminded and do not believe things only because of a particular society you grew up in and don't recognise that. Rebuke? Harte usually qoutes scientific theories but science is a type of philosophy and is not the be it end all of logical thought. Scientific theories are determined by perceived visual information but science does not prove the information seen by the consciousness is accurate, logic is understood by other types of philosophies. The poem you wrote or qoutes or some of each does not apply to every person, I trained myself to think logically in other words to question everything and not care about silly social norms; an intellectual and an alpha male rather then an ignorant and a beta or alpha. The poem matiphorically does apply to what is usually always occurred, occurring, and what will occur in the future based off the data I know about; articles, scientific studies, and so on. great poem. Interesting that around a day after a potential cause some accounts are created, and that people that created the accounts posted logical statements. a riddle: what goes around and around but does not stop unless acted on, never moving away from its parts, always going forward at the gong of a practical bell. you are a genius of you can solve that. Nobody that I know of has through out human history solved that. I am not a tin foil [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Community Meta
Introductions & Welcomes
Yeats
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top