Re: John Titor Is A Hoax Exclusive Report
The most popular parlour game in ithe forty year history of the EU has always been [email='@hose]''Whose[/email] country's in the biggest economic mess?"
Again, nothing new there. If you go looking you'll always find some soothsayers of politics willing to dust off the spectre of Europe-wide crises.
As for those tricky rules of Titor's:
2. I will not disclose any detailed information that would allow someone to
avoid death by probability. This means no earthquake or bombing information.
Rule 2 as a case in point. I reassert my contention that Titor violates his own rule by simple virtue of writing it down for others to read ( whether he discloses detailed information or not). If the whole purpose of the rule is to prevent someone from living when they should die in our normal time-line why does he communicate with us in any way at all?
Out of the many people who simply spend time reading his words, there will be someone whose life will be altered by the time spent doing so who may then cause someone else's life to change in another manner later. Eventually, major repercussions might well take place further down the line for yet another person. That person might change the timing of an action or a decision they make and as a result, save their lives or the lives of someone else. How could Titor guarantee then that someone wouldn't 'avoid death by probability' as a result of his posting ANY information?
The causality changes resulting from anyone spending so much as a second glancing at a single one of his postings would have such far-reaching effects I believe his rules of non-disclosure are worse than pointless.
The most popular parlour game in ithe forty year history of the EU has always been [email='@hose]''Whose[/email] country's in the biggest economic mess?"
Again, nothing new there. If you go looking you'll always find some soothsayers of politics willing to dust off the spectre of Europe-wide crises.
As for those tricky rules of Titor's:
2. I will not disclose any detailed information that would allow someone to
avoid death by probability. This means no earthquake or bombing information.
Rule 2 as a case in point. I reassert my contention that Titor violates his own rule by simple virtue of writing it down for others to read ( whether he discloses detailed information or not). If the whole purpose of the rule is to prevent someone from living when they should die in our normal time-line why does he communicate with us in any way at all?
Out of the many people who simply spend time reading his words, there will be someone whose life will be altered by the time spent doing so who may then cause someone else's life to change in another manner later. Eventually, major repercussions might well take place further down the line for yet another person. That person might change the timing of an action or a decision they make and as a result, save their lives or the lives of someone else. How could Titor guarantee then that someone wouldn't 'avoid death by probability' as a result of his posting ANY information?
The causality changes resulting from anyone spending so much as a second glancing at a single one of his postings would have such far-reaching effects I believe his rules of non-disclosure are worse than pointless.
