10 DIMENSIONS

[Ejie]

This is about as polite as I can be, you're so bloody wrong it's funny.

The binary code is about 1’s and 0’s repeating and isn’t it a coincidence that all the digits repeat after 10, and 1+0=10

Think of the present moment as like gravity where you are falling, there is no present moment where you are not falling and frozen in midair. In the strangest sense I guess you could say time is gravity which is bound by mass that not even light can escape from its gravitational pull just like for example from a black hole, and that is why light does not experience time because it is massless, but can be affected by time such as the gravitational pull of a black hole.

 

[FarOutThere]

There is no present moment. It’s only the past and the future, because time is constantly moving that means time would STOP if there was a present moment. The universe consists of 10 DIMENSIONS that repeats itself like the binary code. My 10 DIMENSIONS THEORY is based on numbers because after 10 the numbers just repeat over and over again.

I often use 3 dimensions of space, 1 dimension of time, and 6 hidden spatial dimensions which are curled up. (10 total). This is basic string theory and it has proven itself to have valuable insights.

Within what framework are the 10 dimensions repeating themselves? Also, if its 10, 10, 10 over again its not necessarily binary code, unless there are other combinations of 1's and 0's. More like alternating on and off.

 

[Ejie]

I often use 3 dimensions of space, 1 dimension of time, and 6 hidden spatial dimensions which are curled up. (10 total). This is basic string theory and it has proven itself to have valuable insights.

Within what framework are the 10 dimensions repeating themselves? Also, if its 10, 10, 10 over again its not necessarily binary code, unless there are other combinations of 1's and 0's. More like alternating on and off.

Instead of repeating themselves, I should have said reshaping themselves.

 

[PaulaJedi]

If time was happening all at once that would mean we have no free will to make our own choices and decisions that would mean we probably wouldn’t even have the ability to think to be conscious that would mean we have absolutely no control over anything, we shouldn’t even be experiencing time, which I highly doubt.

Yes we do. It's laid out AS IS...this particular timeline....but we can make changes. It's not static. We branch out like webs and create other universes when we make decisions.

 

[Ejie]

Yes we do. It's laid out AS IS...this particular timeline....but we can make changes. It's not static. We branch out like webs and create other universes when we make decisions.

I think the universe is constantly reshaping itself like as if it is programmed to automatically correct its mistakes but that doesn’t mean mistakes won’t happen, so in that sense I would agree with you that it’s not static.

 

[Noah_A_S]

This is about as polite as I can be, you're so bloody wrong it's funny.

What I don't understand is why the OP said that we live in a universe with 3 dimensions and later stated that our universe has 10 dimensions.

If he was saying that we exist inside a universe that has 10 dimensions, where we as humans only experience 3 of them, (Length, width, and depth) I would understand his reasoning a bit better.

But he goes on to say that we live in a universe w/ 3, then he counts time as a dimension, which I believe is incorrect, because time is perceptual, and isn't even considered one of the fundamental forces of nature, and then he says that the universe has 10 dimensions.

Okay, that's fine but string theory has pros and cons.

I think the videos on Quantum Gravity Research (on YouTube) lay this out pretty well in a couple of documentaries that they published.

Although I disagree with their stance on there only being 8 dimensions. I am of the theory that there is no conceivable end to the amount of dimensions in the universe.

Just as there is no conceivable beginning, end, or center of the universe because if something has no conceivable beginning and no conceivable end, how can there be a center to it?

I often use 3 dimensions of space, 1 dimension of time, and 6 hidden spatial dimensions which are curled up. (10 total). This is basic string theory and it has proven itself to have valuable insights.

I have zero clue how any of you can correlate binary with spatial dimensions.

Binary is a mathematical system for counting. it's how computers count. 0 = off while 1 = on. Binary is a set of instructions for modern-day computers to make calculations and allow semiconductors to function.

The only thing I've ever seen relating binary to "the universe" is the Arecibo Message and the Arecibo Return Message.

Arecibo message - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The Arecibo message is an interstellar radio message carrying basic information about humanity and Earth that was sent to the globular cluster Messier 13 in 1974. It was meant as a demonstration of human technological achievement, rather than a real attempt to enter into a conversation with extraterrestrials.

The message was broadcast into space a single time via frequency modulated radio waves at a ceremony to mark the remodeling of the Arecibo Telescope in Puerto Rico on 16 November 1974. The message was aimed at the current location of M13, about 25,000 light years from Earth, because M13 was a large and relatively close collection of stars that was available in the sky at the time and place of the ceremony. When correctly translated into graphics, characters, and spaces, the 1,679 bits of data contained within the message form the image shown here.


The message consists of seven parts that encode the following: (from the top down in the image)

• The numbers one to ten (white; left to right)
• The atomic numbers of the elements hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and phosphorus, which make up deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) (purple)
• The formulas for the chemical compounds that make up the nucleotides of DNA (green)
• The estimated number of DNA nucleotides in the human genome, and a graphic of the double helix structure of DNA (white and blue, respectively)
• The dimension (physical height, 5'9") of an average man (blue/white), a graphic figure of a human being (red), and the human population of Earth which was about 4 billion at the time (white)
• A graphic of the Solar System (including Pluto), indicating which of the planets the message is coming from (yellow). The Sun is on the left and the third planet, Earth, raised toward the human figure
• A graphic of the Arecibo radio telescope and the dimension (the physical diameter) of the transmitting antenna dish (purple, white, and blue)

The entire message consisted of 1,679 binary digits, approximately 210 bytes, transmitted at a frequency of 2,380 MHz and modulated by shifting the frequency by 10 Hz, with a power of 450 kW. The "ones" and "zeros" were transmitted by frequency shifting at the rate of 10 bits per second. The total broadcast was less than three minutes.

The Arecibo Message was sent by a group of scientists led by Frank Drake and Carl Sagan.

• Frank Drake: A renowned SETI researcher and professor of astronomy at Cornell University. He is also known for the Drake Equation, which estimates the probability of life beyond Earth.
• Carl Sagan: A famous scientific communicator.
• Richard Isaacman: A Cornell graduate student at the time.
• Linda May: A graduate student who is now a professor of physical sciences at Wheelock College in Massachusetts.
• James C.G. Walker: A member of the Arecibo staff at the time who is now a professor of physical sciences at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor.

It was designed as a "Hello" to any extraterrestrial life so that we could establish communication and contact w/ any E.T. beings that may exist and was sent by SETI

Within what framework are the 10 dimensions repeating themselves? Also, if its 10, 10, 10 over again its not necessarily binary code, unless there are other combinations of 1's and 0's. More like alternating on and off.

He's just not making sense.

I think he's having trouble articulating what it is that he is trying to say.

 

[Ejie]

What I don't understand is why the OP said that we live in a universe with 3 dimensions and later stated that our universe has 10 dimensions.

If he was saying that we exist inside a universe that has 10 dimensions, where we as humans only experience 3 of them, (Length, width, and depth) I would understand his reasoning a bit better.

But he goes on to say that we live in a universe w/ 3, then he counts time as a dimension, which I believe is incorrect, because time is perceptual, and isn't even considered one of the fundamental forces of nature, and then he says that the universe has 10 dimensions.

Okay, that's fine but string theory has pros and cons.

I think the videos on Quantum Gravity Research (on YouTube) lay this out pretty well in a couple of documentaries that they published.

Although I disagree with their stance on there only being 8 dimensions. I am of the theory that there is no conceivable end to the amount of dimensions in the universe.

Just as there is no conceivable beginning, end, or center of the universe because if something has no conceivable beginning and no conceivable end, how can there be a center to it?

I have zero clue how any of you can correlate binary with spatial dimensions.

Binary is a mathematical system for counting. it's how computers count. 0 = off while 1 = on. Binary is a set of instructions for modern-day computers to make calculations and allow semiconductors to function.

The only thing I've ever seen relating binary to "the universe" is the Arecibo Message and the Arecibo Return Message.

View attachment 19335View attachment 19336

Arecibo message - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The Arecibo message is an interstellar radio message carrying basic information about humanity and Earth that was sent to the globular cluster Messier 13 in 1974. It was meant as a demonstration of human technological achievement, rather than a real attempt to enter into a conversation with extraterrestrials.

The message was broadcast into space a single time via frequency modulated radio waves at a ceremony to mark the remodeling of the Arecibo Telescope in Puerto Rico on 16 November 1974. The message was aimed at the current location of M13, about 25,000 light years from Earth, because M13 was a large and relatively close collection of stars that was available in the sky at the time and place of the ceremony. When correctly translated into graphics, characters, and spaces, the 1,679 bits of data contained within the message form the image shown here.


The message consists of seven parts that encode the following: (from the top down in the image)

• The numbers one to ten (white; left to right)
• The atomic numbers of the elements hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and phosphorus, which make up deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) (purple)
• The formulas for the chemical compounds that make up the nucleotides of DNA (green)
• The estimated number of DNA nucleotides in the human genome, and a graphic of the double helix structure of DNA (white and blue, respectively)
• The dimension (physical height, 5'9") of an average man (blue/white), a graphic figure of a human being (red), and the human population of Earth which was about 4 billion at the time (white)
• A graphic of the Solar System (including Pluto), indicating which of the planets the message is coming from (yellow). The Sun is on the left and the third planet, Earth, raised toward the human figure
• A graphic of the Arecibo radio telescope and the dimension (the physical diameter) of the transmitting antenna dish (purple, white, and blue)

The entire message consisted of 1,679 binary digits, approximately 210 bytes, transmitted at a frequency of 2,380 MHz and modulated by shifting the frequency by 10 Hz, with a power of 450 kW. The "ones" and "zeros" were transmitted by frequency shifting at the rate of 10 bits per second. The total broadcast was less than three minutes.

The Arecibo Message was sent by a group of scientists led by Frank Drake and Carl Sagan.

• Frank Drake: A renowned SETI researcher and professor of astronomy at Cornell University. He is also known for the Drake Equation, which estimates the probability of life beyond Earth.
• Carl Sagan: A famous scientific communicator.
• Richard Isaacman: A Cornell graduate student at the time.
• Linda May: A graduate student who is now a professor of physical sciences at Wheelock College in Massachusetts.
• James C.G. Walker: A member of the Arecibo staff at the time who is now a professor of physical sciences at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor.

It was designed as a "Hello" to any extraterrestrial life so that we could establish communication and contact w/ any E.T. beings that may exist and was sent by SETI

He's just not making sense.

I think he's having trouble articulating what it is that he is trying to say.

They say, everywhere in the universe is the center of the universe, but I think the center of the universe is where the Big Bang started, and I believe that there had to be something before the Big Bang because of the Laws of Cause and Effect. You say that you believe in infinite dimensions which is true because for example the binary code which is only two digits of 1’s and 0’s can stretch out to infinity! It seems like you are not seeing that spatial dimensions curve. Thank You for your insight!

 

[Noah_A_S]

They say, everywhere in the universe is the center of the universe, but I think the center of the universe is where the Big Bang started, and I believe that there had to be something before the Big Bang because of the Laws of Cause and Effect. You say that you believe in infinite dimensions which is true because for example the binary code which is only two digits of 1’s and 0’s can stretch out to infinity! It seems like you are not seeing that spatial dimensions curve. Thank You for your insight!

Okay here's my rebuttal, starting with your first point:

There is no center of the universe. For as something vast as space and as timeless as infinity, (to quote Rod Serling, in the season 1 intro to The Twilight Zone) there shouldn't mathematically be a such thing as the center of everything.

You have probably never heard of plasma cosmology either.

Alfvén devised “plasma cosmology,” a concept that challenged the big-bang model of the origin of the universe. The theory posited that the universe had no beginning (and has no foreseeable end) and that plasma—with its electric and magnetic forces—has done more to organize matter in the universe into star systems and other large observed structures than has the force of gravity.

Source: Hannes Alfven | Biography & Facts | Britannica

All of creation is infinitely vast. If you had watched the two video documentaries I posted above, you would have seen the analogy about the pool that the person narrating made about infinity.

To quote:

"When did I enter the pool?"

"You never entered the pool. You have always been in the pool."

"Okay but where was I, before I entered the pool?"

"That's a false question. There was no before you entered the pool. You have always been in the pool."

"Okay but always, like, how long? A billion years?"" I must've been born at some point."

"No. A billion years ago happened a billion years ago.

What was BEFORE me?"

"Okay, so. What's our commmunication disconect here? There is no before you. You have always existed in the pool. Always. Forever."

She then goes on to say that we as humans cannot grasp the concept of something always having been. It just doesn't compute.

Like if I told you this road, literally goes on forever, you'd be like "I don't get it. I cannot grasp infinity".

Without a comprehensive and total understanding of what makes infinity, infinity. there is zero hope to grasp how vast, and endless the universe live inside of, truly is. Let alone to understand the true nature of infinity itself.

But that also means that the best we can do is to come up with our own models of how we think the universe operates on a fundamental level and to challenge other hypotheses and theories with newer ones, like the one I posted above, (Plasma Cosmology) and others.

Yes, I said I believe that the universe is comprised of infinitely ever-expanding, ever-vast dimensional layers that each do not have an end in sight, for those living inside of them.

This is probably best described in Shakespearian scholar, Edwin Abbott Abbott's "Flatland", and is probably made easily understood and coherent to those interested in understanding it, by watching the following video of Carl Sagan explaining Edwin's "Flatland".

Here I can link the video, but so far you have yet to express any interest in having a conversation about it and so far, seem to only want to argue, instead of having a healthy debate.

Also, I find it equally confusing that you seem to say that the universe has 10 dimensions, at times, and at other times you seem to believe it has 3 dimensions.

And then you go on to say that it is true that the universe has infinite dimensions. You said it yourself.

"You say that you believe in infinite dimensions which is true because for example the binary code which is only two digits of 1’s and 0’s can stretch out to infinity!"

So which is it, then? 3 Dimensions? 4 Dimensions? 10 Dimensions? 11? 12? 15? 25? 100? 150? Or is it infinite like you and I already agreed upon?

"for example the binary code which is only two digits of 1’s and 0’s can stretch out to infinity!"

So... Umm. here's the thing about what you just said:

As I stated earlier, yesterday, binary is a mathematical system for counting. it's how computers count. 0 = off while 1 = on. Binary is a set of instructions for modern-day computers to make calculations and allow semiconductors to function.

I don't know why you keep saying that binary can explain how many dimensions exist in reality. The binary is simply BASE-2. Humans don't count on Base-2. We use Base 10. This is also called decimal.

Base Converters exist and you can use them to translate anything between different counting and encryption methods.

I like the one on rapidtables.com See below:

Base Converter | Number conversion

Base conversion calculator with steps: binary,decimal,octal,hex conversion.

www.rapidtables.com

Binary is simply what computers use to read, write, and execute code, for example, a text file on a hard disk, using 0s and 1s. And

You seem to think we exist in some kind of machine, or computer, and I'll be honest: I think you're just talking about self-simulation hypothesis.

I say this because you seem to act like we live and exist on a hard drive, and by the look of how, and why you keep mentioning binary, I'm inclined to say that you just believe there's binary everywhere in the universe.... That doesn't make sense at all.

You know what does make sense though?

The notion that the universe is timeless and everlasting, both in terms of 'when', and of 'how', but also of 'why'.

We may never be able to understand or even comprehend the universe. Like. ever. At all.

We probably won't ever truly grasp infinity, just like we won't ever know how many dimensions there are in all of reality.

We'll probably never, ever obtain that understanding.

The universe just exists, and so do we. And that's okay.

Sometimes the fun in life is had in 'not knowing'. Just like we don't know what's going to happen next.

 

[Ejie]

Okay here's my rebuttal, starting with your first point:

There is no center of the universe. For as something vast as space and as timeless as infinity, (to quote Rod Serling, in the season 1 intro to The Twilight Zone) there shouldn't mathematically be a such thing as the center of everything.

You have probably never heard of plasma cosmology either.



Source: Hannes Alfven | Biography & Facts | Britannica

All of creation is infinitely vast. If you had watched the two video documentaries I posted above, you would have seen the analogy about the pool that the person narrating made about infinity.

To quote:









She then goes on to say that we as humans cannot grasp the concept of something always having been. It just doesn't compute.

Like if I told you this road, literally goes on forever, you'd be like "I don't get it. I cannot grasp infinity".View attachment 19349

Without a comprehensive and total understanding of what makes infinity, infinity. there is zero hope to grasp how vast, and endless the universe live inside of, truly is. Let alone to understand the true nature of infinity itself.

But that also means that the best we can do is to come up with our own models of how we think the universe operates on a fundamental level and to challenge other hypotheses and theories with newer ones, like the one I posted above, (Plasma Cosmology) and others.

Yes, I said I believe that the universe is comprised of infinitely ever-expanding, ever-vast dimensional layers that each do not have an end in sight, for those living inside of them.

This is probably best described in Shakespearian scholar, Edwin Abbott Abbott's "Flatland", and is probably made easily understood and coherent to those interested in understanding it, by watching the following video of Carl Sagan explaining Edwin's "Flatland".

Here I can link the video, but so far you have yet to express any interest in having a conversation about it and so far, seem to only want to argue, instead of having a healthy debate.

Also, I find it equally confusing that you seem to say that the universe has 10 dimensions, at times, and at other times you seem to believe it has 3 dimensions.

And then you go on to say that it is true that the universe has infinite dimensions. You said it yourself.

So which is it, then? 3 Dimensions? 4 Dimensions? 10 Dimensions? 11? 12? 15? 25? 100? 150? Or is it infinite like you and I already agreed upon?


So... Umm. here's the thing about what you just said:

As I stated earlier, yesterday, binary is a mathematical system for counting. it's how computers count. 0 = off while 1 = on. Binary is a set of instructions for modern-day computers to make calculations and allow semiconductors to function.

I don't know why you keep saying that binary can explain how many dimensions exist in reality. The binary is simply BASE-2. Humans don't count on Base-2. We use Base 10. This is also called decimal.

Base Converters exist and you can use them to translate anything between different counting and encryption methods.

I like the one on rapidtables.com See below:

Base Converter | Number conversion

Base conversion calculator with steps: binary,decimal,octal,hex conversion.

www.rapidtables.com

Binary is simply what computers use to read, write, and execute code, for example, a text file on a hard disk, using 0s and 1s. And

You seem to think we exist in some kind of machine, or computer, and I'll be honest: I think you're just talking about self-simulation hypothesis.

I say this because you seem to act like we live and exist on a hard drive, and by the look of how, and why you keep mentioning binary, I'm inclined to say that you just believe there's binary everywhere in the universe.... That doesn't make sense at all.

You know what does make sense though?

The notion that the universe is timeless and everlasting, both in terms of 'when', and of 'how', but also of 'why'.

We may never be able to understand or even comprehend the universe. Like. ever. At all.

We probably won't ever truly grasp infinity, just like we won't ever know how many dimensions there are in all of reality.

We'll probably never, ever obtain that understanding.

The universe just exists, and so do we. And that's okay.

Sometimes the fun in life is had in 'not knowing'. Just like we don't know what's going to happen next.

There might be infinite dimensions as you mentioned and that we agreed upon, but only 3 spatial dimensions and one dimension of time that we know of, the binary code was just an analogy for you to be able to comprehend and distinguish the difference between what “dimensions” actually are in the physical universe rather than the ones you just imagine. The 10 Dimensions was just a theory I came up with because all the digits repeat after 10 referencing to the analogy of how the binary code repeats just 2 digits of 1’s and 0’s and how that might be connected, maybe the universe is a programable computer simulation for all we know with infinite possibilities! Thank You for all your valuable information, I greatly appreciate it!

 

[Noah_A_S]

There might be infinite dimensions as you mentioned and that we agreed upon, but only 3 spatial dimensions and one dimension of time that we know of, the binary code was just an analogy for you to be able to distinguish the difference between what “dimensions” actually are in the physical universe rather than the ones you just imagine. Thank You for all your valuable information, I greatly appreciate it!

Okay, but what I said was that there may be, and probably definitely are infinite spatial dimensions.

Time is misunderstood as a dimension often. It isn't just you. A lot of people say often that time is the fourth dimension.

Time is a product of:

1. Desnity
2. Gravity.

I already said this on page 1 of this thread/topic.

Time is relative to an epicenter of mass, like a planet, a moon, or a star.

Time is simply a measurement that intelligent life ascribes to the universe to make sense of everything else that we experience.

If the binary code was just an analogy for me to be able to distinguish the difference between what “dimensions” actually are in the physical universe rather than the ones I imagine, then the above is how I see it.

I think you're just a tiny bit confused and are probably having trouble articulating your thoughts in a way that is meaningful for me.

That's fine. But maybe try to plan out what you're going to say the next time you want to say something before you do.