Jean-Luc Picard
New Member
- Messages
- 5
The exectutive needs modification.....like titor said. And the masses need education.....
Just as Titor predicted in 2016 the constitution will be amended
Martin Armstrong Warns Of 2016 Constitutional Convention | Zero Hedge
A very interesting political development has taken place, but you can bet the Democrats will fight tooth-and-nail to prevent it. This week the state legislature of Michigan became the 34th state to demand a “Constitutional Convention” in the United States. Pursuant to Article 5 of the US Constitution, if 2/3rds of the states call for such a convention, (meaning 34 states) it MUST take place. We will see if this is actually honored. At the very least, there is no time requirement so this could be dragged out for years.
#1 Limit the definition of American interests to the territory within the United StatesI don't see anything wrong with the constitution. What I do see is state and federal government not abiding by the constitution. It's like what we are taught and what we see are two different things. Our belief in the constitution may be a false belief. The constitution may never have existed. Take a look around. Are we being controlled and lulled into a false sense of security through false beliefs? We are taught to believe. It starts with religion. Then it moves forward into everything else. As a child it started with Santa Claus. But time and time again I see my beliefs fall. Close inspection of scientific theories reveals the same pattern. Facts are being replaced with fictional beliefs, or theories. So science is just like religion. Pure belief with no real substance. It looks to me like someone has gone to great lengths to control us all with belief systems that apparently aren't real. Personally I think the ET's are behind this level of control. It's the Tower of Babel all over again.
I see your point, now. I'm trying to figure out what part of the constitution should be changed. (Reading through it). I suppose, personally, I don't like this style of government, which is why I would want to overhaul the entire thing. A new style of government would mean a new constitution needed. First problem I see, and this is just my opinion, that Congress has too much power. I'm not going to debate that, though. I'd lose. I'm not a political person. lol.
Facts are being replaced with fictional beliefs, or theories. So science is just like religion
In some cases, yes. But when people do have real evidence, nobody believes it. Also, much truth is HIDDEN from the general population.
A theory isn't a law. It is a supposition. It is speculation. Creative thinking. Potential. So, can you really fairly call all theories fiction? They have the potential to become discovered as legitimate, don't they? Innocent until proven guilty? No, I'm not saying real until proven otherwise, but how about POSSIBLE until proven otherwise?