Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
41 Dancing Bunnies and Time Waves
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="8thsinner" data-source="post: 255921" data-attributes="member: 15138"><p>I don't see it as a wave at all, it is only a perception of changes that we hold on to in memories.</p><p></p><p>It is now proven physics that we exist in some kind of simulated reality where your own individual reality is the only one that matters because if a bear tried to shit in the woods with no observers it couldn't. Because there would be no bear.</p><p>There must be an observer for reality to exist.</p><p>We know bears do shit in the woods when humans aren't observing, because if we come and go to the woods we see evidence of this. So either, the bear continues to exist in its own reality, or we made it all up and only see evidence because we look for it.</p><p>Or, both.</p><p>For the first to be true, then it must be a part of another entity's reality which is continuously observing one and other, you could map this as a complex web of back and forth observations from the plants, trees, ants etc.</p><p>For the second to be true, we would have to know that bears can shit in the first place, and obv at this point in history most people know this, but when you get on to talking about more complex things that we do NOT actually understand then we literally couldn't make it up because it is outside of our thinking boxes.</p><p>In order for us to be observing anything then, there must be another observer or complex system of multiple observers for a thing to exist and follow any kind of patterns for us to be able to observe and learn from as human observers and scientists.</p><p>Which is the system I believe exists because i've talked to trees and plants etc, I know there is sentience there, I also work with crystals which my customers use to talk to other beings in the universe, sometimes from their home planets, sometimes angels and other kinds of beings. I also know that if I can communicate with beings like trees then there is an underlying system that we both share which isn't based on spoken language, and splitting everything down the only thing everything has in common, is vibration. What ever it is made of, it is moving, even at the coldest temperatures so far measurable, there is some movement in oscillation.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So, if there is sentience, and sentience is creating quantum fluctuations and positions measurable then everything is alive and connected. I guess this is main point 1</p><p></p><p>When we talk about anything in time, what we are doing is actually talking about the differences between one state and another. That is all it is.</p><p>At one point in time my finger was small, NOW, it is not as small. We cannot perceive more than any one state at a time, we move from state 1, to state 2 and back again. Baby, adult, baby, adult. Leaving the logical conclusion that time is based on singular perceptions at a time.</p><p>We call it time because we remember extraordinarily quickly that more than one state existed, and we play them in our minds frame by frame by frame. Baby, teenager, adult etc</p><p></p><p>The smallest measure of time there fore the the smallest measurable difference between one state and another, using our current scientific level, this is the time distance it takes one photon to move in x y or z positions, the smallest of these measurable states is 1 with 43 zeros, times, smaller than a metre. is it 43 or 42? the planck length??? sure its 43</p><p>This therefore, is one unit of so called time.</p><p>But again, it's only a snapshot of reality.</p><p>reality 1, reality 2, reality 3 etc</p><p></p><p>Planck 1, planck 2, etc</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Now, if you have more than one thing simultaneously existing, which we must assume because there must be an observer and a thing to observe then this chain of events does suggest if you follow the chain of snapshots all the way back, then at one time, there was only one thing, the chain of cause and effect must have began somewhere in order for changes to be recorded as snapshots of differences.</p><p>I admit this does give some credence to the big bang theory which I see no other reason to be real other than this change.</p><p></p><p>Interesting that is all vibration is, or can, be called sound, and almost all of the bibles about creation speak of the sound coming into reality first don't ya think, the "word" as the christian bible calls it, but the word is ohm to the indians etc etc.</p><p></p><p>Anyway.</p><p>If the only thing that can be perceived is the difference between one state and another, then there is no actual fluidity there, because all things are changing states at different intervils, this must mean there are multiples of different types of change.</p><p>Just because the planck is the smallest measurable doesn't mean in other ways that everything is always moving, there has to be some sort of pause where there are multiple frames where nothing appears to happen at all. Lets say thats the molecular movement differences between gold and carbon.</p><p></p><p>Where does the illusion of time consistency come from then?</p><p></p><p>It comes from our brains capacity to process information, or, some devices capacity to process information, again, it comes down to the observer effect.</p><p></p><p>lets pretend reality didn't change as quick and say its' working at 60 frames per second but our brains are only able to percieve 15 frames a second, theres a whole lot of things we can't see changing at different rates. we would in effect see things vanish and reappear in some circumstances because something that only ever moves at 49 frames per second might not be visible for another 150 cycles of our observation frames. picking completely arbitrarily I hope you know....</p><p></p><p>reality would blink in and out of existence but it doesn't because our perception is limited to a certain super slow observation level, or observation speed. And again to refer back to local reality not existing without an observer this implies that there is always an observer present, which again kinda gets on to the god thing doesn't it..</p><p></p><p>So basically we're back to, the idea of absolute time being only one possible measure, the planck length.</p><p></p><p>So back to, if it's all a cause and effect chain because we are only measuring state differences, then in order to see more than one thing at a time, like a finger and a table, which might be on different cause and effect state change periods there must be some sort of background wall that connects and reflects both the things different state changes.</p><p></p><p>So, if there are state changes, and a background that connects all things so that more than one thing can be observed at any given opportunity, what is it then that is is being observed? How would you measure the differences between states that are thousands of snapshots of reality apart.</p><p></p><p>Simplify this down super dumb again, you have ten dots of reality, in ten random locations on a bit of paper, it's a bit like a qr code right, depending on our perceptions sometimes a dot is visible sometimes it isn't because the frame rate doesn't match up, it's still there, sort of behind itself but it's flashing on and off..</p><p>What are qr codes if not for coordinates of states on a known map...right?</p><p></p><p>Lets complicate matters a little more and add the changes as differences in tone, or colour, to represent evolutions, carbon is carbon is carbon until it meets something else then technically it's not carbon anymore its carbon plus something else. you have two merged frame stacks. If these were two decks of cards and you're piling them up beside each other</p><p></p><p> then they merge them it becomes on pile, instead of two, it is only really known to be be one pile from then on. but then something else comes along like a knife and it splits the pile into two different sections again but only through so many card, it may or may not be carbon plus something, it may in fact be, carbon plus something PLUS carbon plus something else. Only. both piles are smaller along specific dimensions.</p><p></p><p>Where is the underlying foundation here that shows everything at the same time? again, it can be measured as change but it's adding another dimensionality to itself.</p><p>There is only one singular frame of reference for two half cards on top of one full card, the exact beginning point of the merge</p><p>Now if you were mapping this as a 3d qr code, then this specific arrangement will look very different to the next one.</p><p>You could perhaps argue that this is a wave effect but thats not where I am going because it's not in a state of A or B, it is a state of C, it is a new state entirely. WAVES only have a peak and a trough and the curvature between them.</p><p>A sine wave isn't going to suddenly become a square wave. if you catch my meaning.</p><p></p><p>In coded form it might look like what we now use as colour mapping hex codes or binary. 101101 suddenly becomes 101121121 on the next stack but theres the space between stacks.</p><p></p><p>The coded form of the state of being between these two states looks more like 101101121121 then if we kept following the stack upwards in code it remains 121121, but if its ten stacks high where the split is, the reference point for any coordinate becomes more like 101101101101101101101101101101101101101101101101101101101101101101121121121121121121121121121121</p><p></p><p>If we stick to the qr code form here but in 3d, then you have multiple stacks beside each other...I think you're about to see how this relates more to qbits...and quantum fluctuations.</p><p>If all these stacks beside each other are flashing on off on off but you only cut one stack somewhere in the middle, the only real noticeable shift in code is the highlighted portion where something outside of the foundation changes, lets say this cut deck is red.</p><p>If we convert everything back to sound, instead of binary like code, and because things happen as snapshots, there is only ever one of every reality. Which means there is only a never ending orchestra of changing sounds.</p><p></p><p>Speed things up a bit, add more changes, and different changes to different stacks. You suddenly have a cube where you might think you have to map each and every coordinate of each and every change or non change in order to see both the stack that changed and the background states. But you don't really, you can map it by vectors instead of steps if that makes sense.</p><p></p><p>This is actually how time travel works, in a way.</p><p>The exact state of any given reality is not the conclusion of every step and next step and next step, it is a reflection of points of vectors between various known configurations of potentials. And those changes in vector points only get noticed when they interact with something. Call it short hand if you will. And the shorthand is the frequency.</p><p></p><p>There is only one possible sound that reflects the observer, observing the state differences on coordinate, lets say x4y5z2.</p><p>You following where I am going here??</p><p></p><p>Law of resonance. And reverb..</p><p>Any material vibrating at a given rate will create the effect of resonance when it encounters another same material. Because I can hit a tuning fork on one side of the room and another tuning fork in the same tone at the other end of the room vibrates, In that moment of interaction a new reality is made because it is being observed.</p><p></p><p>When you live a memory in the now moment, you are observing the state changes between A and B,</p><p>When you relive memory from a future point, you are not observing the same state change coordinate A/B, you are observing the observer, this is a new state in itself. A//B-C</p><p>The only way to go back to be the initial observer is to vibrate at the same rate you were observing from in the first place, and if you do that, the law of resonance demands that that state will be the one you observe.</p><p></p><p>Because reality is not a simple state A to state B thing, because more than one thing exists and is not real as is proven and is in fact a myriad of billions of states all interchanging with billions of other states at the same time and is being observed. At any point in history, it only ever has one singular sound. billions and billions and billions of potentials of different sound snapshots.</p><p>But only one sound combination is possible where that snapshot is being observed by you.</p><p></p><p>Also, as Einstein just pointed out to me as a reminder, we make choices, and so does everything else, quantum states if you will, so its never a line of stacked snapshots straight up in the air but a curve or zigzag of choices. More like the leaning tower of piza, but every choice is still recorded and exists as an option, being put into effect anytime the observer chooses to observe it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="8thsinner, post: 255921, member: 15138"] I don't see it as a wave at all, it is only a perception of changes that we hold on to in memories. It is now proven physics that we exist in some kind of simulated reality where your own individual reality is the only one that matters because if a bear tried to shit in the woods with no observers it couldn't. Because there would be no bear. There must be an observer for reality to exist. We know bears do shit in the woods when humans aren't observing, because if we come and go to the woods we see evidence of this. So either, the bear continues to exist in its own reality, or we made it all up and only see evidence because we look for it. Or, both. For the first to be true, then it must be a part of another entity's reality which is continuously observing one and other, you could map this as a complex web of back and forth observations from the plants, trees, ants etc. For the second to be true, we would have to know that bears can shit in the first place, and obv at this point in history most people know this, but when you get on to talking about more complex things that we do NOT actually understand then we literally couldn't make it up because it is outside of our thinking boxes. In order for us to be observing anything then, there must be another observer or complex system of multiple observers for a thing to exist and follow any kind of patterns for us to be able to observe and learn from as human observers and scientists. Which is the system I believe exists because i've talked to trees and plants etc, I know there is sentience there, I also work with crystals which my customers use to talk to other beings in the universe, sometimes from their home planets, sometimes angels and other kinds of beings. I also know that if I can communicate with beings like trees then there is an underlying system that we both share which isn't based on spoken language, and splitting everything down the only thing everything has in common, is vibration. What ever it is made of, it is moving, even at the coldest temperatures so far measurable, there is some movement in oscillation. So, if there is sentience, and sentience is creating quantum fluctuations and positions measurable then everything is alive and connected. I guess this is main point 1 When we talk about anything in time, what we are doing is actually talking about the differences between one state and another. That is all it is. At one point in time my finger was small, NOW, it is not as small. We cannot perceive more than any one state at a time, we move from state 1, to state 2 and back again. Baby, adult, baby, adult. Leaving the logical conclusion that time is based on singular perceptions at a time. We call it time because we remember extraordinarily quickly that more than one state existed, and we play them in our minds frame by frame by frame. Baby, teenager, adult etc The smallest measure of time there fore the the smallest measurable difference between one state and another, using our current scientific level, this is the time distance it takes one photon to move in x y or z positions, the smallest of these measurable states is 1 with 43 zeros, times, smaller than a metre. is it 43 or 42? the planck length??? sure its 43 This therefore, is one unit of so called time. But again, it's only a snapshot of reality. reality 1, reality 2, reality 3 etc Planck 1, planck 2, etc Now, if you have more than one thing simultaneously existing, which we must assume because there must be an observer and a thing to observe then this chain of events does suggest if you follow the chain of snapshots all the way back, then at one time, there was only one thing, the chain of cause and effect must have began somewhere in order for changes to be recorded as snapshots of differences. I admit this does give some credence to the big bang theory which I see no other reason to be real other than this change. Interesting that is all vibration is, or can, be called sound, and almost all of the bibles about creation speak of the sound coming into reality first don't ya think, the "word" as the christian bible calls it, but the word is ohm to the indians etc etc. Anyway. If the only thing that can be perceived is the difference between one state and another, then there is no actual fluidity there, because all things are changing states at different intervils, this must mean there are multiples of different types of change. Just because the planck is the smallest measurable doesn't mean in other ways that everything is always moving, there has to be some sort of pause where there are multiple frames where nothing appears to happen at all. Lets say thats the molecular movement differences between gold and carbon. Where does the illusion of time consistency come from then? It comes from our brains capacity to process information, or, some devices capacity to process information, again, it comes down to the observer effect. lets pretend reality didn't change as quick and say its' working at 60 frames per second but our brains are only able to percieve 15 frames a second, theres a whole lot of things we can't see changing at different rates. we would in effect see things vanish and reappear in some circumstances because something that only ever moves at 49 frames per second might not be visible for another 150 cycles of our observation frames. picking completely arbitrarily I hope you know.... reality would blink in and out of existence but it doesn't because our perception is limited to a certain super slow observation level, or observation speed. And again to refer back to local reality not existing without an observer this implies that there is always an observer present, which again kinda gets on to the god thing doesn't it.. So basically we're back to, the idea of absolute time being only one possible measure, the planck length. So back to, if it's all a cause and effect chain because we are only measuring state differences, then in order to see more than one thing at a time, like a finger and a table, which might be on different cause and effect state change periods there must be some sort of background wall that connects and reflects both the things different state changes. So, if there are state changes, and a background that connects all things so that more than one thing can be observed at any given opportunity, what is it then that is is being observed? How would you measure the differences between states that are thousands of snapshots of reality apart. Simplify this down super dumb again, you have ten dots of reality, in ten random locations on a bit of paper, it's a bit like a qr code right, depending on our perceptions sometimes a dot is visible sometimes it isn't because the frame rate doesn't match up, it's still there, sort of behind itself but it's flashing on and off.. What are qr codes if not for coordinates of states on a known map...right? Lets complicate matters a little more and add the changes as differences in tone, or colour, to represent evolutions, carbon is carbon is carbon until it meets something else then technically it's not carbon anymore its carbon plus something else. you have two merged frame stacks. If these were two decks of cards and you're piling them up beside each other then they merge them it becomes on pile, instead of two, it is only really known to be be one pile from then on. but then something else comes along like a knife and it splits the pile into two different sections again but only through so many card, it may or may not be carbon plus something, it may in fact be, carbon plus something PLUS carbon plus something else. Only. both piles are smaller along specific dimensions. Where is the underlying foundation here that shows everything at the same time? again, it can be measured as change but it's adding another dimensionality to itself. There is only one singular frame of reference for two half cards on top of one full card, the exact beginning point of the merge Now if you were mapping this as a 3d qr code, then this specific arrangement will look very different to the next one. You could perhaps argue that this is a wave effect but thats not where I am going because it's not in a state of A or B, it is a state of C, it is a new state entirely. WAVES only have a peak and a trough and the curvature between them. A sine wave isn't going to suddenly become a square wave. if you catch my meaning. In coded form it might look like what we now use as colour mapping hex codes or binary. 101101 suddenly becomes 101121121 on the next stack but theres the space between stacks. The coded form of the state of being between these two states looks more like 101101121121 then if we kept following the stack upwards in code it remains 121121, but if its ten stacks high where the split is, the reference point for any coordinate becomes more like 101101101101101101101101101101101101101101101101101101101101101101121121121121121121121121121121 If we stick to the qr code form here but in 3d, then you have multiple stacks beside each other...I think you're about to see how this relates more to qbits...and quantum fluctuations. If all these stacks beside each other are flashing on off on off but you only cut one stack somewhere in the middle, the only real noticeable shift in code is the highlighted portion where something outside of the foundation changes, lets say this cut deck is red. If we convert everything back to sound, instead of binary like code, and because things happen as snapshots, there is only ever one of every reality. Which means there is only a never ending orchestra of changing sounds. Speed things up a bit, add more changes, and different changes to different stacks. You suddenly have a cube where you might think you have to map each and every coordinate of each and every change or non change in order to see both the stack that changed and the background states. But you don't really, you can map it by vectors instead of steps if that makes sense. This is actually how time travel works, in a way. The exact state of any given reality is not the conclusion of every step and next step and next step, it is a reflection of points of vectors between various known configurations of potentials. And those changes in vector points only get noticed when they interact with something. Call it short hand if you will. And the shorthand is the frequency. There is only one possible sound that reflects the observer, observing the state differences on coordinate, lets say x4y5z2. You following where I am going here?? Law of resonance. And reverb.. Any material vibrating at a given rate will create the effect of resonance when it encounters another same material. Because I can hit a tuning fork on one side of the room and another tuning fork in the same tone at the other end of the room vibrates, In that moment of interaction a new reality is made because it is being observed. When you live a memory in the now moment, you are observing the state changes between A and B, When you relive memory from a future point, you are not observing the same state change coordinate A/B, you are observing the observer, this is a new state in itself. A//B-C The only way to go back to be the initial observer is to vibrate at the same rate you were observing from in the first place, and if you do that, the law of resonance demands that that state will be the one you observe. Because reality is not a simple state A to state B thing, because more than one thing exists and is not real as is proven and is in fact a myriad of billions of states all interchanging with billions of other states at the same time and is being observed. At any point in history, it only ever has one singular sound. billions and billions and billions of potentials of different sound snapshots. But only one sound combination is possible where that snapshot is being observed by you. Also, as Einstein just pointed out to me as a reminder, we make choices, and so does everything else, quantum states if you will, so its never a line of stacked snapshots straight up in the air but a curve or zigzag of choices. More like the leaning tower of piza, but every choice is still recorded and exists as an option, being put into effect anytime the observer chooses to observe it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
41 Dancing Bunnies and Time Waves
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top