Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
50 years today, man set off to land on the Moon..Did it really happen?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JackStagger" data-source="post: 184055" data-attributes="member: 11397"><p>If you're actually interested in the real answer this article has them, and no it's not because the moon is too bright. I can't even find where NASA said that, assuming you're implying that quotation is direct.</p><p><a href="https://www.scienceabc.com/eyeopeners/can-we-use-telescopes-to-see-if-the-moon-landings-were-real.html" target="_blank">Can We Use Telescopes To See If The Moon Landings Were Real? » Science ABC</a></p><p></p><p>I did find this, which <em>directly</em> dispels that notion:</p><p>"I worked with Hubble Space Telescope (HST) for many years. First it was with early data (taken weeks after launch) for my PhD research, and then several years helping to build and calibrate a camera on board STIS. Working with HST (as those of us in the know call it) and doing as much outreach as I do, I learned quickly that there are a lot of misconceptions about the orbiting observatory.</p><p></p><p>One of the most frequent is that it can’t observe the Moon, because our natural satellite is too bright. Trying to snap a shot of it would damage Hubble’s detectors.</p><p></p><p>That’s not true. Well, not totally true. Some cameras on HST are very sensitive, and could be damaged if pointed to a bright source. The ultraviolet camera I worked on was so sensitive it would fry if it looked some kinds of stars too faint to even see with the naked eye!"</p><p>Source: <a href="https://slate.com/technology/2013/03/hubble-photo-of-the-moon-the-crater-tycho-up-close-and-personal.html" target="_blank">Hubble Snaps a Photo of the Crater Tycho on the Moon</a></p><p></p><p>We DO have pictures of the moon landing site from the LRO, but since that's not Hubble it's probably bunk, right? Only Hubble can tell us, but it can't because then people would think Earth telescopes can see it— even though they literally cannot and everyone can at least know that much for sure...right?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JackStagger, post: 184055, member: 11397"] If you're actually interested in the real answer this article has them, and no it's not because the moon is too bright. I can't even find where NASA said that, assuming you're implying that quotation is direct. [URL='https://www.scienceabc.com/eyeopeners/can-we-use-telescopes-to-see-if-the-moon-landings-were-real.html']Can We Use Telescopes To See If The Moon Landings Were Real? » Science ABC[/URL] I did find this, which [I]directly[/I] dispels that notion: "I worked with Hubble Space Telescope (HST) for many years. First it was with early data (taken weeks after launch) for my PhD research, and then several years helping to build and calibrate a camera on board STIS. Working with HST (as those of us in the know call it) and doing as much outreach as I do, I learned quickly that there are a lot of misconceptions about the orbiting observatory. One of the most frequent is that it can’t observe the Moon, because our natural satellite is too bright. Trying to snap a shot of it would damage Hubble’s detectors. That’s not true. Well, not totally true. Some cameras on HST are very sensitive, and could be damaged if pointed to a bright source. The ultraviolet camera I worked on was so sensitive it would fry if it looked some kinds of stars too faint to even see with the naked eye!" Source: [URL='https://slate.com/technology/2013/03/hubble-photo-of-the-moon-the-crater-tycho-up-close-and-personal.html']Hubble Snaps a Photo of the Crater Tycho on the Moon[/URL] We DO have pictures of the moon landing site from the LRO, but since that's not Hubble it's probably bunk, right? Only Hubble can tell us, but it can't because then people would think Earth telescopes can see it— even though they literally cannot and everyone can at least know that much for sure...right? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
50 years today, man set off to land on the Moon..Did it really happen?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top