Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
50 years today, man set off to land on the Moon..Did it really happen?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TimeFlipper" data-source="post: 184065" data-attributes="member: 6456"><p>Yes i agree with you just how good they looked after the time spent in zero gravity, or a small amount of gravity (one sixth the gravity of Earth, i think)..I would have thought their leg muscles might have shrunk a little (especially Michael Collins who was in the CSM orbiting the Moon), resulting in hesitancy and staggering out the module to retain balance, dont you think? . The oxygen storage got me thinking too...</p><p></p><p>Apparently, the Lunar Lander held two tanks, each containing 48 pounds of gaseous oxygen plus a smaller tank holding about 2.5 pounds of gaseous oxygen, purely for the ascent back to the Command and Service Module....The two tanks were used to supply the astronauts back packs, whilst they were wandering about on the moon..</p><p></p><p>I did a check on what the size of each tank would be, that could hold 48 pounds of gaseous oxygen...Each tank size would be about 600 cubed feet..So could they have had 1200 cubed feet of space available in the Lunar Lander, just to hold oxygen and a pressurised system of 2600psi (pounds per square inch) to get the oxygen into the astronauts back packs?....I didnt check on the amount of oxygen that the CSM carried, and there were also three men consuming oxygen, going to and from the Moon..</p><p></p><p>Apparently, sometime in 2009, and in some dark corner of a basement of a University in the UK (unnamed), were 50% of the original first edition video tapes found, and subsequently lost again!!.....Also in 2009 some NASA guy said on UK TV that most of the original first edition video tapes were "recorded over", because of the high cost of video tapes in 1969!!!....Imagine, recording over the original video tapes of the greatest most incredible time EVER in scientific achievement <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite55" alt=":ROFLMAO:" title="ROFL :ROFLMAO:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":ROFLMAO:" />!!!!</p><p></p><p>Some NASA guys again made up a ruse about the "lost technology" behind the Moon landing of 1969, just to cover up the reality of how pitiful technology was then...There are even videos and written evidence that only a couple of weeks before the Moon journey began, the Lunar Lander was still highly unstable, and consequently kept crashing!!...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TimeFlipper, post: 184065, member: 6456"] Yes i agree with you just how good they looked after the time spent in zero gravity, or a small amount of gravity (one sixth the gravity of Earth, i think)..I would have thought their leg muscles might have shrunk a little (especially Michael Collins who was in the CSM orbiting the Moon), resulting in hesitancy and staggering out the module to retain balance, dont you think? . The oxygen storage got me thinking too... Apparently, the Lunar Lander held two tanks, each containing 48 pounds of gaseous oxygen plus a smaller tank holding about 2.5 pounds of gaseous oxygen, purely for the ascent back to the Command and Service Module....The two tanks were used to supply the astronauts back packs, whilst they were wandering about on the moon.. I did a check on what the size of each tank would be, that could hold 48 pounds of gaseous oxygen...Each tank size would be about 600 cubed feet..So could they have had 1200 cubed feet of space available in the Lunar Lander, just to hold oxygen and a pressurised system of 2600psi (pounds per square inch) to get the oxygen into the astronauts back packs?....I didnt check on the amount of oxygen that the CSM carried, and there were also three men consuming oxygen, going to and from the Moon.. Apparently, sometime in 2009, and in some dark corner of a basement of a University in the UK (unnamed), were 50% of the original first edition video tapes found, and subsequently lost again!!.....Also in 2009 some NASA guy said on UK TV that most of the original first edition video tapes were "recorded over", because of the high cost of video tapes in 1969!!!....Imagine, recording over the original video tapes of the greatest most incredible time EVER in scientific achievement :ROFLMAO:!!!! Some NASA guys again made up a ruse about the "lost technology" behind the Moon landing of 1969, just to cover up the reality of how pitiful technology was then...There are even videos and written evidence that only a couple of weeks before the Moon journey began, the Lunar Lander was still highly unstable, and consequently kept crashing!!... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
50 years today, man set off to land on the Moon..Did it really happen?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top