The Infinite Creator can't be reached for comment, nor verify it's credentials? You DO realize YOU ARE the Infinite Creator, right? Are you saying you don't exist? Or are you just not liberated?
Are you serious?
Brahman - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'm not the infinite creator. There is no creator. I do exist. As for liberation, that depends on what you mean. I'm self-employed, so I'm liberated from the 9-5 hell most people suffer. I don't make much, so I'm trapped in a low income situation, but that will improve eventually. I'm trapped in a frail, mortal body, but that too will improve as medical technology does. I'm trapped on Earth, but mankind will expand to the stars sooner or later. I'm trapped in this time, but that won't last forever either.
I'm happy. (Most days, my software has a few bugs)
What? We descended from the infinite creator. "post" in measurement of the infinite breaks down completely due to general relativity.
Your logic is terrible.
See the point above regarding the infinite creator. As for post-human, it simply refers to the concept of surpassing our current form, changing who we are fundamentally, through technology. The set of real numbers is infinite, but you can still have numbers that come after other numbers. Any number after 5 is a "post-5" number.
There's that BUZZ word again! Funny how you measure incomprehension by your own measuring stick instead of objective truth.
If I can't understand what you're saying, then what you're saying is, to me, incomprehensible. It's not an objective thing, it's subjective. If you change how you say things, or I learn something that allows me to understand what you say, then it stops being incomprehensible to me. As it is, I lack that key, and you're unwilling to change, so we're at an impasse. (And the key won't come from something you link me to, or from a poem, or an image, because the key is required to understand those too)
"I'm not the infinite creator. There is no creator. I do exist."
Then you misunderstand the nature of the infinite, the nature of creation, the nature of the cosmos, and the link I gave you. You are also making a definite claim when there is solely evidence to the contrary.
"As for liberation, that depends on what you mean."
Well, I obviously meant what I linked to that you apparently did not read.
In
Hinduism,
Brahman (
/ˈbrɑːmən/;
Sanskrit: ब्रह्मन्
bráhman) is "the unchanging reality amidst and beyond the world",
[1] which "cannot be exactly defined".
[2] It has been described in Sanskrit as
Sat-cit-ānanda (being-consciousness-bliss)
[3] and as the highest reality.
[4][note 1][note 2]
Brahman is conceived as
Atman,
[note 3] personal,
[note 4] impersonal[note 5] or
Para Brahman,
[note 6] or in various combinations of these qualities depending on the
philosophical school.
According to
Advaita, a liberated human being (
jivanmukta) has realised Brahman as his or her own
true self.
The
Isha Upanishad says:
Auṃ – That supreme
Brahman is infinite, and this conditioned
Brahman is infinite. The infinite proceeds from infinite. If you subtract the infinite from the infinite, the infinite remains alone.
"See the point above regarding the infinite creator. As for post-human, it simply refers to the concept of surpassing our current form, changing who we are fundamentally, through technology. The set of real numbers is infinite, but you can still have numbers that come after other numbers. Any number after 5 is a "post-5" number."
Brownian ratchet - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"If I can't understand what you're saying, then what you're saying is, to me, incomprehensible. It's not an objective thing, it's subjective. If you change how you say things, or I learn something that allows me to understand what you say, then it stops being incomprehensible to me. As it is, I lack that key, and you're unwilling to change, so we're at an impasse. "
However, that does not mean what I am saying is incomprehensible, it just means that you are unwilling to comprehend it.
