Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
About 13,000 home security customers were shown someone else’s home.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MODAT7" data-source="post: 255713" data-attributes="member: 13649"><p>In the article, Wyze made an amateur mistake. That's just sloppy programming and verification. Unfortunately, that's very common in the industry.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I've never liked wireless cameras because of the jammers Kim talked about. Hell, all you need is an old analog 2.4GHz baby monitor and you can take out somebody's wifi. While intentional jammers are illegal, there's nothing illegal about a baby monitor. The security and encryption on wifi cameras is also questionable.</p><p></p><p>This extends to wireless door and window sensors, keypads, and the like.</p><p></p><p>If you're being cased, a small single board computer and a battery pack monitoring radio frequencies can also be used to log when you're home and active and when you're not.</p><p></p><p>If you want mickey mouse security, you go wireless. If you want real security, you go wired (with all the wires NOT being exposed).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MODAT7, post: 255713, member: 13649"] In the article, Wyze made an amateur mistake. That's just sloppy programming and verification. Unfortunately, that's very common in the industry. I've never liked wireless cameras because of the jammers Kim talked about. Hell, all you need is an old analog 2.4GHz baby monitor and you can take out somebody's wifi. While intentional jammers are illegal, there's nothing illegal about a baby monitor. The security and encryption on wifi cameras is also questionable. This extends to wireless door and window sensors, keypads, and the like. If you're being cased, a small single board computer and a battery pack monitoring radio frequencies can also be used to log when you're home and active and when you're not. If you want mickey mouse security, you go wireless. If you want real security, you go wired (with all the wires NOT being exposed). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
About 13,000 home security customers were shown someone else’s home.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top