Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Advanced Titor Analysis;
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Judge Bean" data-source="post: 18467" data-attributes="member: 42"><p><strong>Advanced Titor Analysis;</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>He said that he could think of no quicker and easier way to start a war than to have one of the main powerful nations invent time travel. I don't know why he said so, but that's what he said. He said this more than once. Also, he said that all of the components for the technology were now at hand, and that recent developments would bring it closer. He said that all that was lacking at the moment was the power source, which had something to do with as-yet unknown and exotic subatomic particles.</p><p></p><p>In other words, on his worldline, it wasn't invented until 2034; on ours, he himself was partly responsible for its earlier invention.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>He could be speaking of nothing else when he asks what notorious event that was highly expected did not come to pass "within the last year and a half." The FAXs are clearly from the same person, and even contain some of the same phrases. Moreover, in his posts, he states that he had gone to 1998, and his trips all seem to have taken place in the Springtime. I do not think that it is altogether clear that he appeared in 2000; he states that he has been around for "months." He also stated that his worldline was at maximum 2.5% divergent between 2036 and 1975. He did not say that it was "indistinguishable" from ours.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think you are probably right about this, but my point was that he did not talk about the war this way all at one time. He described the nuclear exchange as a sneak attack on a distracted U.S., with China and Europe thown in for good measure. That was in November, 2000; in February, 2001, he doesn't mention the "sides" of the combatants, but only that China attacked the U.S. and Europe-- omitting to mention Russia. I think that this is an error on his part, or that he'd forgotten what he'd said before. </p><p></p><p>China is not now capable of launching an attack of this type on all three targets, and even less so if hit unexpectedly. Of course, Titor says nothing about an arms buildup in China or whether it expected to be bombed. As I understand it, the U.S. would be the only nation capable of hitting that many continents all at once with any substantial effect.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Good answers. Next?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Judge Bean, post: 18467, member: 42"] [b]Advanced Titor Analysis;[/b] He said that he could think of no quicker and easier way to start a war than to have one of the main powerful nations invent time travel. I don't know why he said so, but that's what he said. He said this more than once. Also, he said that all of the components for the technology were now at hand, and that recent developments would bring it closer. He said that all that was lacking at the moment was the power source, which had something to do with as-yet unknown and exotic subatomic particles. In other words, on his worldline, it wasn't invented until 2034; on ours, he himself was partly responsible for its earlier invention. He could be speaking of nothing else when he asks what notorious event that was highly expected did not come to pass "within the last year and a half." The FAXs are clearly from the same person, and even contain some of the same phrases. Moreover, in his posts, he states that he had gone to 1998, and his trips all seem to have taken place in the Springtime. I do not think that it is altogether clear that he appeared in 2000; he states that he has been around for "months." He also stated that his worldline was at maximum 2.5% divergent between 2036 and 1975. He did not say that it was "indistinguishable" from ours. I think you are probably right about this, but my point was that he did not talk about the war this way all at one time. He described the nuclear exchange as a sneak attack on a distracted U.S., with China and Europe thown in for good measure. That was in November, 2000; in February, 2001, he doesn't mention the "sides" of the combatants, but only that China attacked the U.S. and Europe-- omitting to mention Russia. I think that this is an error on his part, or that he'd forgotten what he'd said before. China is not now capable of launching an attack of this type on all three targets, and even less so if hit unexpectedly. Of course, Titor says nothing about an arms buildup in China or whether it expected to be bombed. As I understand it, the U.S. would be the only nation capable of hitting that many continents all at once with any substantial effect. Good answers. Next? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Advanced Titor Analysis;
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top