Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Advanced Titor Analysis;
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="StarLord" data-source="post: 18473" data-attributes="member: 44"><p><strong>Advanced Titor Analysis;</strong></p><p></p><p>That's a plate full. </p><p></p><p>A couple of things still bugging me about the whole shabang.</p><p></p><p>Y2K: Computers won't have the ability to roll over to 2001 and therefore shut down. How do we know that this wasn't some sweet dreamchild of a bored hacker / programer that worked for a large software company whose sales were lagging. What better way to stimulate sales for something than to create a need to fix something that isn't broken? Take a stab at how much sales soared for Y2K fixes and how many different versions were available for sale towards the last few months.</p><p></p><p>Any one care to take a guess at how many registers out there that have a computer in them that are unprogramable and Still functioned after the magic moment?</p><p></p><p>Modern cars all have computers in them under the passenger seat. Did all those cars quit working? Does anybody remember of anyone shelling out money to have their cars fixed because of Y2K or a recall by a car manufacturer to fix them?</p><p></p><p>Something of this smells JUST like the wizbang idea that ATT or MaBell came up with just after it was fined all those millions by the government. Remember all those years of 'rent' we have been paying for the telephone each month. Surely it was paid for in a years worth of telephone bills; if millions of them were manufactured the actual cost of one of them is very cheap. So out of the blue, the telephone company is going to sell you that telephone, which as been bought twenty times over, for the measely price of $25.00 and you won't have to pay money for it ever again (until the next scam) just Imagine how much money that scam generated for the telephone company.</p><p></p><p>My inference was that titor had nothing to do with Y2K except to realize that because it did NOT happen, proved to him that, yes, the golden 2.5% divergence was a valid clause and that he would never get back to his real line, thus he became increasingly dispondent and depressed.</p><p></p><p>The CAD drawing of Lev's regarding the machine shows two singularity chambers. The amount of force it would take to contain a singularity by way of a magnetic field in a chamber that small boggles the mind. I am all for miniturization and the rule of thumb concerning such has progressed mightlily, but if I am not mistaken accelerators are getting larger and larger are they not?</p><p>The more watts you want to run through a speaker and have it work well, doesn't the magnet have to be correspondingly big? Compare the magnet of a 5" tweeter to the one on a 12" or 16".... Something tells me that in order to generate a magnetic field powerfull enough to contain a singularity, the magnet it self is going to have to be somewhat larger than that bootlocker. And there are two of them side by side......</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="StarLord, post: 18473, member: 44"] [b]Advanced Titor Analysis;[/b] That's a plate full. A couple of things still bugging me about the whole shabang. Y2K: Computers won't have the ability to roll over to 2001 and therefore shut down. How do we know that this wasn't some sweet dreamchild of a bored hacker / programer that worked for a large software company whose sales were lagging. What better way to stimulate sales for something than to create a need to fix something that isn't broken? Take a stab at how much sales soared for Y2K fixes and how many different versions were available for sale towards the last few months. Any one care to take a guess at how many registers out there that have a computer in them that are unprogramable and Still functioned after the magic moment? Modern cars all have computers in them under the passenger seat. Did all those cars quit working? Does anybody remember of anyone shelling out money to have their cars fixed because of Y2K or a recall by a car manufacturer to fix them? Something of this smells JUST like the wizbang idea that ATT or MaBell came up with just after it was fined all those millions by the government. Remember all those years of 'rent' we have been paying for the telephone each month. Surely it was paid for in a years worth of telephone bills; if millions of them were manufactured the actual cost of one of them is very cheap. So out of the blue, the telephone company is going to sell you that telephone, which as been bought twenty times over, for the measely price of $25.00 and you won't have to pay money for it ever again (until the next scam) just Imagine how much money that scam generated for the telephone company. My inference was that titor had nothing to do with Y2K except to realize that because it did NOT happen, proved to him that, yes, the golden 2.5% divergence was a valid clause and that he would never get back to his real line, thus he became increasingly dispondent and depressed. The CAD drawing of Lev's regarding the machine shows two singularity chambers. The amount of force it would take to contain a singularity by way of a magnetic field in a chamber that small boggles the mind. I am all for miniturization and the rule of thumb concerning such has progressed mightlily, but if I am not mistaken accelerators are getting larger and larger are they not? The more watts you want to run through a speaker and have it work well, doesn't the magnet have to be correspondingly big? Compare the magnet of a 5" tweeter to the one on a 12" or 16".... Something tells me that in order to generate a magnetic field powerfull enough to contain a singularity, the magnet it self is going to have to be somewhat larger than that bootlocker. And there are two of them side by side...... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Advanced Titor Analysis;
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top