Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Advanced Titor Analysis;
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Judge Bean" data-source="post: 18480" data-attributes="member: 42"><p><strong>Advanced Titor Analysis;</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p>My friend, I am no expert, but there are times when plain simple common sense in basic science ideas hit one harder than a brick wall at 50 mph. I cannot see some fool tossing theories out like this to serve as a proverbial debunking carrot when it's plain to see that some of these things were not thought all the way through to their logical end.</p><p></p><p>Mind you, I am not trying to give you and your ideas a hard time. What I am trying to do is something like a verbal debate infront of the blackboard that is full of mathematical formulae and holes that have become apparent to even someone as lacking in the nuances of science as I am.</p><p></p><p>You an I have passed the point of argument very long ago. And, as you know, there are times when an idea crops up that has not been touched upon and I seem to be the unwitting host of such.</p><p style="text-align: right"></p><p>[/b]</p></blockquote><p></p><p>At the risk of sounding as though I am trying to fit failed facts into a rationalization of failed prophecies overall, I think that Titor has put out a "cover story" about how the physics is supposed to work on his juryrigged machine. The root of the problem lies in the power source, and the awful consumption of mass required to make his story hold together-- which it fails to do.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, in a couple of places in his posts he alludes to a power source and vital components of the technology which do not fit with the cover story. I will show my work on this pretty soon, and it has to do with the set of onboard computers he describes.</p><p></p><p>If I am correct, the problem would be approached from an entirely different angle, and, again, it raises the question why he would go to all of that trouble to mask the real technology.</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="Judge Bean, post: 18480, member: 42"] [b]Advanced Titor Analysis;[/b] My friend, I am no expert, but there are times when plain simple common sense in basic science ideas hit one harder than a brick wall at 50 mph. I cannot see some fool tossing theories out like this to serve as a proverbial debunking carrot when it's plain to see that some of these things were not thought all the way through to their logical end. Mind you, I am not trying to give you and your ideas a hard time. What I am trying to do is something like a verbal debate infront of the blackboard that is full of mathematical formulae and holes that have become apparent to even someone as lacking in the nuances of science as I am. You an I have passed the point of argument very long ago. And, as you know, there are times when an idea crops up that has not been touched upon and I seem to be the unwitting host of such. [right][/right] [/b][/quote] At the risk of sounding as though I am trying to fit failed facts into a rationalization of failed prophecies overall, I think that Titor has put out a "cover story" about how the physics is supposed to work on his juryrigged machine. The root of the problem lies in the power source, and the awful consumption of mass required to make his story hold together-- which it fails to do. On the other hand, in a couple of places in his posts he alludes to a power source and vital components of the technology which do not fit with the cover story. I will show my work on this pretty soon, and it has to do with the set of onboard computers he describes. If I am correct, the problem would be approached from an entirely different angle, and, again, it raises the question why he would go to all of that trouble to mask the real technology. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Advanced Titor Analysis;
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top