Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Aliens & UFOs
Ancient Aliens
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CarpeNemo" data-source="post: 44170" data-attributes="member: 2550"><p>Alright. I did some further looking into Sitchin's works. Found some areas where he's definitely wrong, some parts that are more iffy, and overall I still think he did a damned fine job of his research.</p><p></p><p>I suppose to a large extent I was infatuated with his works, but I still stand by them. At the very least, they're an informative read that offers different perspectives on the subject. In my opinion - he's still got a tidy sum of information right. But even the highly esteemed and adored Einstein has some things wrong, so I'll take that in stride and stand by what he's got right.</p><p></p><p>I appreciate your input, though, 'cause it did lead me to question some things that were bugging me (and most of the things that were bugging me turned out to be wrong-wrongish, truthfully) and I have a different viewpoint on the man and his works now.</p><p></p><p>I'd also like to point out that I like to read Sitchin's works for my own amusement, and I'm sure there's parts of his works that could be considered accurate, that I've misunderstood and have retold with more than a hint of inaccuracy. But what concerns me most is this:</p><p></p><p>How many people considered Einstein to be nutters before research proved him right? Every researcher's got critics, and while it's good to have counterbalancing data, it's also of note to point out that critics do not make research wrong.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CarpeNemo, post: 44170, member: 2550"] Alright. I did some further looking into Sitchin's works. Found some areas where he's definitely wrong, some parts that are more iffy, and overall I still think he did a damned fine job of his research. I suppose to a large extent I was infatuated with his works, but I still stand by them. At the very least, they're an informative read that offers different perspectives on the subject. In my opinion - he's still got a tidy sum of information right. But even the highly esteemed and adored Einstein has some things wrong, so I'll take that in stride and stand by what he's got right. I appreciate your input, though, 'cause it did lead me to question some things that were bugging me (and most of the things that were bugging me turned out to be wrong-wrongish, truthfully) and I have a different viewpoint on the man and his works now. I'd also like to point out that I like to read Sitchin's works for my own amusement, and I'm sure there's parts of his works that could be considered accurate, that I've misunderstood and have retold with more than a hint of inaccuracy. But what concerns me most is this: How many people considered Einstein to be nutters before research proved him right? Every researcher's got critics, and while it's good to have counterbalancing data, it's also of note to point out that critics do not make research wrong. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Aliens & UFOs
Ancient Aliens
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top