Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Aliens & UFOs
Ancient Aliens
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Harte" data-source="post: 44268" data-attributes="member: 443"><p>Sitchin isn't the best writer - I'd say Graham Hancock is much better at the craft.</p><p></p><p>My problem is that these writers basically completely dismiss theories put forward by the people that have been crouched over the ground with a trowel and a brush every digging season for 30 and 40 years as if they either simply had no idea what they were talking about, or were all involved in some great conspiracy to prevent people from learning about the past (thus limiting their own careers in the process for reasons that can't stand the light of even the slightest scrutiny.)</p><p></p><p>Well, that and the fact that I found out they were lying to me. I don't appreciate having fallen myself for their misrepresentations of the past.</p><p></p><p>I will, however, give some credit to these pseudohistorians for engaging people in learning about the past, a step CarpeNemo has apparently just taken with regard to Sitchin's claims and one I took 25 years ago. However, some people simply read these books (or watch the crockumentaries) and take every word as gospel. Those folks never end up actually learning anything about the past. They do continue to provide a readership to these kniow-nothing fringe writers that make a living from claiming everyone else is wrong.</p><p></p><p>Harte</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Harte, post: 44268, member: 443"] Sitchin isn't the best writer - I'd say Graham Hancock is much better at the craft. My problem is that these writers basically completely dismiss theories put forward by the people that have been crouched over the ground with a trowel and a brush every digging season for 30 and 40 years as if they either simply had no idea what they were talking about, or were all involved in some great conspiracy to prevent people from learning about the past (thus limiting their own careers in the process for reasons that can't stand the light of even the slightest scrutiny.) Well, that and the fact that I found out they were lying to me. I don't appreciate having fallen myself for their misrepresentations of the past. I will, however, give some credit to these pseudohistorians for engaging people in learning about the past, a step CarpeNemo has apparently just taken with regard to Sitchin's claims and one I took 25 years ago. However, some people simply read these books (or watch the crockumentaries) and take every word as gospel. Those folks never end up actually learning anything about the past. They do continue to provide a readership to these kniow-nothing fringe writers that make a living from claiming everyone else is wrong. Harte [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Aliens & UFOs
Ancient Aliens
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top