Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Aliens & UFOs
Ancient Aliens
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="darwi" data-source="post: 97436" data-attributes="member: 6291"><p>To me, trying to understand things from an artificially derived scale is counterproductive. In my view, it mainly shows that people are often more interested in intellectual arguments than a balanced mind approach. Remember, there are two halves to the mind that need to be balanced for better understanding. Too much of one and we get intellectual egotism. Too much of the other and we get an out of control imagination. It pays to understand both physics and metaphysics in a balanced way, I believe. It's also helpful to hear and understand enlightened sources when we can find them. For example, Enlightened sources indicate the proclivity for life everywhere, on and within planets and suns, and even in seemingly empty space, in my view. So, when enlightened sources indicate that human life in etheric form lives on Venus AND there is strong intuitive synchronicity in my life that indicates to me that I came from there a long time ago, I take it very seriously. And I have a natural tendency or bias against intellectual arguments, as I often find them to be distortions of the truth or just completely wrong. Meanwhile, I'm not enlightened, my understanding isn't perfect and I'm still learning. Sometimes I make mistakes and have trouble trying to convey what I want to convey. I'll correct my own mistakes when I realize them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="darwi, post: 97436, member: 6291"] To me, trying to understand things from an artificially derived scale is counterproductive. In my view, it mainly shows that people are often more interested in intellectual arguments than a balanced mind approach. Remember, there are two halves to the mind that need to be balanced for better understanding. Too much of one and we get intellectual egotism. Too much of the other and we get an out of control imagination. It pays to understand both physics and metaphysics in a balanced way, I believe. It's also helpful to hear and understand enlightened sources when we can find them. For example, Enlightened sources indicate the proclivity for life everywhere, on and within planets and suns, and even in seemingly empty space, in my view. So, when enlightened sources indicate that human life in etheric form lives on Venus AND there is strong intuitive synchronicity in my life that indicates to me that I came from there a long time ago, I take it very seriously. And I have a natural tendency or bias against intellectual arguments, as I often find them to be distortions of the truth or just completely wrong. Meanwhile, I'm not enlightened, my understanding isn't perfect and I'm still learning. Sometimes I make mistakes and have trouble trying to convey what I want to convey. I'll correct my own mistakes when I realize them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Aliens & UFOs
Ancient Aliens
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top