Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Another Way to Look at Titor's Predictions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Darkwolf" data-source="post: 14137" data-attributes="member: 177"><p><strong>Another Way to Look at Titor's Predictions</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Danso, You bring up a good point. Some people are pointing to a failure of the country to explode into an all out civil war immediatly as proof that Titor was a fraud. However, he did say it started gradually. And the occasional clashes between dissident groups and government forces you describe are a pretty standard start to a civil war. I think that the history books of the era would mark the start of the civil war with something that the public viewing without the benifit of hindsight might consider pretty innocous. It might be more accurate of him to say that "we moved into the pre-war phase after the 2004 elections, we saw isolated skirmishes and "waco events" untill the active military hostilities started in..." </p><p>I don't think any intelligent person would call a couple of skirmishes before a nuke war a "civil war" but it does point out that we don't know what form this war would take if it were to happen. </p><p></p><p>Good post and welcome Dancho</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Darkwolf, post: 14137, member: 177"] [b]Another Way to Look at Titor's Predictions[/b] Danso, You bring up a good point. Some people are pointing to a failure of the country to explode into an all out civil war immediatly as proof that Titor was a fraud. However, he did say it started gradually. And the occasional clashes between dissident groups and government forces you describe are a pretty standard start to a civil war. I think that the history books of the era would mark the start of the civil war with something that the public viewing without the benifit of hindsight might consider pretty innocous. It might be more accurate of him to say that "we moved into the pre-war phase after the 2004 elections, we saw isolated skirmishes and "waco events" untill the active military hostilities started in..." I don't think any intelligent person would call a couple of skirmishes before a nuke war a "civil war" but it does point out that we don't know what form this war would take if it were to happen. Good post and welcome Dancho [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Another Way to Look at Titor's Predictions
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top