Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Alternate Histories & Timelines
Artificial gravity - theories
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Einstein" data-source="post: 227202" data-attributes="member: 288"><p>Yes, I have seen the academic community try and confuse people with their convoluted bullshit. Even conventional current theory used to conform to Faraday's left hand rule. So how did it get turned around? It seems to me like it's an assault on our knowledge base. I think it stems from the idea that the electron is negatively charged. What seems to be removed from the knowledge base is that the charge state on electrons will generally equalize with the surrounding voltage state. Usually the ground state, which can be an isolated ground state. That does imply that the charge state of an electron is variable. Of course that is verifiable when you look at an oscillating voltage on an antenna with a scope. </p><p></p><p>My pet theory based on those observations is that with enough of a voltage swing, that electron can oscillate between an electron and a positron. After all doesn't the voltage swing go from negative to positive? Seems like a nifty way for mother nature to hide all the antimatter in the universe. The two charges are separated in time. Normally neither charge possesses enough temporal energy to cross that temporal barrier.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Einstein, post: 227202, member: 288"] Yes, I have seen the academic community try and confuse people with their convoluted bullshit. Even conventional current theory used to conform to Faraday's left hand rule. So how did it get turned around? It seems to me like it's an assault on our knowledge base. I think it stems from the idea that the electron is negatively charged. What seems to be removed from the knowledge base is that the charge state on electrons will generally equalize with the surrounding voltage state. Usually the ground state, which can be an isolated ground state. That does imply that the charge state of an electron is variable. Of course that is verifiable when you look at an oscillating voltage on an antenna with a scope. My pet theory based on those observations is that with enough of a voltage swing, that electron can oscillate between an electron and a positron. After all doesn't the voltage swing go from negative to positive? Seems like a nifty way for mother nature to hide all the antimatter in the universe. The two charges are separated in time. Normally neither charge possesses enough temporal energy to cross that temporal barrier. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Alternate Histories & Timelines
Artificial gravity - theories
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top