ATF doesn't think people should have explosives..

MadMikeyB

MadMikeyB

Junior Member
Messages
43
I would have thought that this is common sense. Firearms and Explosives are both things which in my opinion are something which should be and are very rightly tightly controlled. Imagine if some lunatic who isnt fully "in control" got hold of some c4 or something, it would be a very real risk. Maybe I miss the point of your post though?

Note; ATF in this post I assume means "Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives"
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=ATF
 

Graveyard Hound

Graveyard Hound

Member
Messages
474
We can't have what? Not that I need them but I have relatives that use them for large stump removal that would give a John Deer tractor fits trying to relocate. Granted it isn't the explosive that is the danger but the "person" using it. As hard as it is to get handguns, it out to be sooo much more difficcult to get chemicals that can make up "weapons of mas destruction" or as the militart defines them "WMD".

PS. Leave my handguns alone.
 

CarpeNemo

CarpeNemo

Junior Member
Messages
77
Down in Mississippi you don't have to have a license for a gun, unless you intend to carry it concealed. The way it should be - gun's don't kill people, people with a loose trigger finger kill people.

You don't blame the drunk driver's car for hitting somebody else, you blame the driver. Same concept. Are we supposed to ban all cars not made from Jet-Puffed marshmallows?
 
Graveyard Hound

Graveyard Hound

Member
Messages
474
As for explosives, as with firearms, rights are rights. if i want them and can get a permit, I should be able to get them. It's just that simple.:mad:
 
Graveyard Hound

Graveyard Hound

Member
Messages
474
I'm sure that's somewhere, xstuck in sideways in The Bill of Rights but then again, not everybbody should have rights as others, now shoulddddd theyyyyyy.!!
 

Top