Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Bedtime for Democracy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zoomerz" data-source="post: 22169" data-attributes="member: 390"><p><strong>Re: Bedtime for Democracy</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p>There is one very major difference in the way the fed intervened then, vs. now. Congress did NOT debate an isolated situation as this is. It addressed a constitutional question first, then (as it should), legislated it, and passed it into law, AND THEN tested these laws in the judiciary.</p><p></p><p>In this case, the legislative branch has done nothing to pass legislation, which can, in turn be signed into law, and adjudicated. The matter is simply being put before the federal judiciary without jurisdiction. It simply has no authority to do so. And I vehemently disagree with "bending" or "breaking" the rules to accomplish this goal either. That creates a VERY dangerous precedent that, mark my words, WILL come back to bite us.</p><p></p><p>I really have no problem with Congress deliberately undertaking legislation on the issue. As a matter of fact, I think that would be a good idea. However, I doubt that it would be of high enough priority in that scheme of things to help Terri Schaivo.</p><p></p><p>Z-</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zoomerz, post: 22169, member: 390"] [b]Re: Bedtime for Democracy[/b] There is one very major difference in the way the fed intervened then, vs. now. Congress did NOT debate an isolated situation as this is. It addressed a constitutional question first, then (as it should), legislated it, and passed it into law, AND THEN tested these laws in the judiciary. In this case, the legislative branch has done nothing to pass legislation, which can, in turn be signed into law, and adjudicated. The matter is simply being put before the federal judiciary without jurisdiction. It simply has no authority to do so. And I vehemently disagree with "bending" or "breaking" the rules to accomplish this goal either. That creates a VERY dangerous precedent that, mark my words, WILL come back to bite us. I really have no problem with Congress deliberately undertaking legislation on the issue. As a matter of fact, I think that would be a good idea. However, I doubt that it would be of high enough priority in that scheme of things to help Terri Schaivo. Z- [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Bedtime for Democracy
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top