Cause of electron ground state?

N

NaturalPhilosopher

Senior Member
what causes it?
what can overcome positive and negative attraction?

theories?

what force can overcome electrostatic attraction at that scale?
gotta be really strong

I'll wait right here for paranormalis' geniuses to answer.
 
Last edited:
The way it was taught to me was the ground state is the dominate voltage state present. All charges will align themselves and either dissipate or absorb energy to synchronize with this dominate voltage field. In addition to that all atoms have a preferred relative voltage state to other atoms. As time moves on I have observed dynamic voltage systems that sometimes will violate these standard principles.

It is standard knowledge that if enough positive voltage is applied to an atom, electrons will repel from the atom and move toward the stronger positive voltage source. I've mentioned that the electron appears to have turned into a positron when it does this. But just briefly. Remove the stronger voltage field and the electron will give up its previous positron status and return to its preferred electron status. But I've found others wont accept that viewpoint.

But it does tend to suggest that an electron can be its own anti-particle just based on what voltage state it is in relative to other electrons.
 

Einstein said:
The way it was taught to me was the ground state is the dominate voltage state present. All charges will align themselves and either dissipate or absorb energy to synchronize with this dominate voltage field. In addition to that all atoms have a preferred relative voltage state to other atoms. As time moves on I have observed dynamic voltage systems that sometimes will violate these standard principles.

It is standard knowledge that if enough positive voltage is applied to an atom, electrons will repel from the atom and move toward the stronger positive voltage source. I've mentioned that the electron appears to have turned into a positron when it does this. But just briefly. Remove the stronger voltage field and the electron will give up its previous positron status and return to its preferred electron status. But I've found others wont accept that viewpoint.

But it does tend to suggest that an electron can be its own anti-particle just based on what voltage state it is in relative to other electrons.
Click to expand...
wut?

i'm talking about why electrons stop migrating towards protons and start orbiting.
 

NaturalPhilosopher said:
wut?

i'm talking about why electrons stop migrating towards protons and start orbiting.
Click to expand...

I believe physicists call those orbits, shells. Standing waves exist between the electron and the nucleus. The electron drops into a low energy section of the standing wave and is trapped there. It doesn't necessarily have to orbit. Another possible solution is that it just stands still in the low energy section of the shell.
 
yes i believe that...
so what is the standing wave and how does it produce a force on the electron...
just photon pressure overcoming the extreme electric attractive force?

bob lazar discusses 2 forms of gravity
gravityA wave(which he delineates as the nuclear strong force) and then....
gravityB wave responsible for normal gravity. Too weak at the atom scale to do anything.

when you understand how B works, the same effect can happen with A.
meaning there's a tangential force due to spin alignment from B when A hits the electron. Causes the force to be 90 degrees to the attractive force of the like charges.

A is translated into electron orbital spin.

since A can be made on a macro scale, should be testable.
also since A is engineerable by pumping the nucleus full of more energy also means orbitals are completely engineerable. Explains the valence electron orbital of ormus changing to make cooper pairs for superconductivity.
 
Last edited:
well if you use an artificial B wave to re-align the electron orbital spins...presto you'd get K-capture.
atomic number of the element would go down.

devices that magnetize nonferrous dielectric metals would do that.
how interesting...

would be a way to make heavy isotopes of a target element.
 
one mercury isotope in a mercury amalgam would become gold.
magnetizing lead, silver, copper and aluminum has been done...it doesn't last but shows the proof.

isotopic and chemical analysis of those materials would show if they transmuted to a lower atomic element

trick would be realigning the electron spins and NOT the nucleus.
electron spins have obviously been done...but idk if affects the nucleus..since it's a resonant free effect it's prob doing both.
if it was doing both then it's also be producing stronger or weaker gravity for the item. So that is testable.

highly likely that if resonance was used, orbitals could be solely targeted.

yup i remember now...resonance is used in some setups....nice.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I would agree there is stuff going on that we are not told about. I still do not understand how I get particles emitted from a Tesla coil with a negative output. It should be sucking particles in.
 

Top