Cause of electron ground state?

what's his name...the guy hit by lightning and in a 39 day coma. Wakes up says he 'knows everything'
he uses 'spin fields' using electromagnets in relation to some weird axis direction and causes transmutation.

Walter Russell.

didn't understand that setup just until now.
:) :coffee:
 
anyways conclusion is gravity and nuclear strong force both work together for electron orbital formation.

since both are now engineerable we can make completely new atoms with totally different atomic diameters and electron orbitals.
whole new class of substances.

what this really means is there's only one force in nature.
all forces are gravitational.

only separation is geometry
 
Last edited:
NaturalPhilosopher said:
anyways conclusion is gravity and nuclear strong force both work together for electron orbital formation.

since both are now engineerable we can make completely new atoms with totally different atomic diameters and electron orbitals.
whole new class of substances.
Click to expand...
Yeah. The nuclear force works on a much smaller scale.
 
Einstein said:
The way it was taught to me was the ground state is the dominate voltage state present. All charges will align themselves and either dissipate or absorb energy to synchronize with this dominate voltage field. In addition to that all atoms have a preferred relative voltage state to other atoms. As time moves on I have observed dynamic voltage systems that sometimes will violate these standard principles.

It is standard knowledge that if enough positive voltage is applied to an atom, electrons will repel from the atom and move toward the stronger positive voltage source. I've mentioned that the electron appears to have turned into a positron when it does this. But just briefly. Remove the stronger voltage field and the electron will give up its previous positron status and return to its preferred electron status. But I've found others wont accept that viewpoint.

But it does tend to suggest that an electron can be its own anti-particle just based on what voltage state it is in relative to other electrons.
Click to expand...
I've never heard this before. Do you have more info? :)
 
Martian said:
I've never heard this before. Do you have more info? :)
Click to expand...

Probably you haven't heard it before because it is just an observation. So if you observe something it is firsthand knowledge. Using relativity it becomes a little easier to understand what you are seeing. For one thing the charge on an electron from observation appears to be variable. If a hydrogen atom is bombarded with a high voltage oscillation field, the electrons energy state will be affected. Its charge state moves to a value that comes out to about half that of the oscillating field. That new charge value being more positive than it was will now allow the electron to move out of its orbital shell and move about freely relative to the oscillating electric field. That is all fine and dandy if you always use an oscillating electric field that is more positive in value than the charge on the proton. But what if you use on oscillating electric field that is negatively biased instead? That info is not addressed in the text books. Even though I personally have rebuilt old transformers that were specifically built to power electric fields that were designed to work that way. So there does appear to be a suppression of knowledge concerning negatively biased electric fields. When I was in school there was no accredited source you could use to educate yourself on Tesla coils. I don't know if that has changed. But info on Tesla coil building is available. And books have been written on them. Now it is not hard to see that if enough voltage is used, an electron could acquire enough positive energy to become a positron. Of course an electron behaving as a positron with that much energy to release upon meeting an electron probably isn't going to be noticeable unless someone was looking for it. I do have a video I made of such an event that can be interpreted that way. Only thing is I created the super negatively biased electron version using a negatively biased Tesla coil. The event might not be observable on your computer though. You may need to play around with your screen brightness and contrast controls to see it. But what happens is I'm holding a screwdriver close to a Tesla coil during discharge. It appears a spark simultaneously jumps from both the Tesla coil and screwdriver and meet halfway at an angle where a the two sparks collide.

 
Come to think of it, I do remember reading that the electric field on a charged particle migrates toward the "equator" of the particle (supposing its velocity direction is analogous to the earth's spin axis), but it only becomes significant at relativistic velocities. I'm not sure a small Tesla coil would do that, though. You are probably describing something else. :unsure:
 
Martian said:
Come to think of it, I do remember reading that the electric field on a charged particle migrates toward the "equator" of the particle (supposing its velocity direction is analogous to the earth's spin axis), but it only becomes significant at relativistic velocities. I'm not sure a small Tesla coil would do that, though. You are probably describing something else. :unsure:
Click to expand...

Yes. It appears you may be referring to a constant value electric field that over powers the electrons energy state. There also is the magnetic field which will produce a counteracting voltage field based on the electrons relative velocity. Its like mother nature is showing us how she produces the perception of weight based on the relative motion of the electron.
 

Top