Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Did John Titor prevent the Y2K event?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="temporal recon" data-source="post: 69072" data-attributes="member: 2826"><p>Hello TT_00, sorry for the delay, a lot seems to be going on at the moment.</p><p> </p><p>First of all, I am extremely impressed that you do not take for granted that the C204 is a perfect machine. I recommend you continue to question the Conventional Wisdom.</p><p> </p><p>As for your theory that his "predictions" failed due to his intervention in our worldline, we should be extremely careful in our assumptions. At no point, ever, did John admit to any intervention or "fixing" of Y2K, <u>ever.</u> Furthermore, he never claimed to change <u>any</u> of our histories. The idea that Titor fixed Y2K is a convenient theory that has no foundation or evidence that supports it. So, the <em>premise </em>of this question/theory is not supported. This premise is understandable though because it gets bandied about as a viable <u>theory</u> (which it is) and eventually, once this theory gets repeated often enough, the details of where it came from becomes clouded and lost and eventually becomes accepted dogma/Conventional Wisdom.</p><p> </p><p>I'm curious, why do you assume that Y2K happened on his worldline? ...again, be careful of your assumptions on where you derive this idea.</p><p> </p><p>And to answer your theory less obtusely, no, his "predictions" did not fail due to any perceived action by him or other TT'ers (yes, there are others).</p><p> </p><p>As Ever</p><p>TR</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="temporal recon, post: 69072, member: 2826"] Hello TT_00, sorry for the delay, a lot seems to be going on at the moment. First of all, I am extremely impressed that you do not take for granted that the C204 is a perfect machine. I recommend you continue to question the Conventional Wisdom. As for your theory that his "predictions" failed due to his intervention in our worldline, we should be extremely careful in our assumptions. At no point, ever, did John admit to any intervention or "fixing" of Y2K, [U]ever.[/U] Furthermore, he never claimed to change [U]any[/U] of our histories. The idea that Titor fixed Y2K is a convenient theory that has no foundation or evidence that supports it. So, the [I]premise [/I]of this question/theory is not supported. This premise is understandable though because it gets bandied about as a viable [U]theory[/U] (which it is) and eventually, once this theory gets repeated often enough, the details of where it came from becomes clouded and lost and eventually becomes accepted dogma/Conventional Wisdom. I'm curious, why do you assume that Y2K happened on his worldline? ...again, be careful of your assumptions on where you derive this idea. And to answer your theory less obtusely, no, his "predictions" did not fail due to any perceived action by him or other TT'ers (yes, there are others). As Ever TR [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Did John Titor prevent the Y2K event?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top