Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Did John Titor prevent the Y2K event?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="temporal recon" data-source="post: 69180" data-attributes="member: 2826"><p>Outstanding work, Sam.</p><p> </p><p>Now, let's ask some (very preliminary) questions in an attempt to identify what we are <em>assuming</em>:</p><p> </p><p>1) Has Haber ever admitted to posting this video? Has anyone asked him this <em>specifically?</em></p><p>2) Other than the obvious statement at the beginning of the video claiming as such, is there any independent information that will support the claim that this was actually written by Titor himself (later posted by Haber, supposedly)?</p><p>3) When was the letter <em>actually written? </em>1998? 2003? 2009? 2012? 2036?</p><p>4) What are the odds that two Johns might "land" on the same world line as stated in the video? <u>According to John's statements in 2000, </u>a "ZD" is <em><u>extremely</u></em> (to the point of impossibility in an infinite multiverse, I <em>assume</em>) unlikely. Did John 1 and John 2 just win the multiverse lotto? Is there possibly a piece of the puzzle here that we are missing?</p><p>5) According to the video, the faxes were meant as a means to communicate divergence measurements. Hmmm....Have you followed up on that lead?</p><p>6) Is it now possible to look at the faxes, not as a means to "set the record straight about time travel" as the author claimed in 1998, but rather to <u><em>communicate?</em></u></p><p>7) <span style="color: #ff0000"><strong>This is important,</strong></span> How tightly are you now holding onto your belief and theory that the faxes were telling the truth about, among other things, Y2K if their <u>actual purpose</u> (according to the video) was to <u>communicate divergence measurements.</u></p><p> </p><p>Please remember: I am not doubting nor debating for one second that Titor was a time traveler. He was. I am merely now trying to demonstrate that the time travel question is orders of magnitude larger than you ever thought.</p><p> </p><p>As Ever</p><p>TR</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="temporal recon, post: 69180, member: 2826"] Outstanding work, Sam. Now, let's ask some (very preliminary) questions in an attempt to identify what we are [I]assuming[/I]: 1) Has Haber ever admitted to posting this video? Has anyone asked him this [I]specifically?[/I] 2) Other than the obvious statement at the beginning of the video claiming as such, is there any independent information that will support the claim that this was actually written by Titor himself (later posted by Haber, supposedly)? 3) When was the letter [I]actually written? [/I]1998? 2003? 2009? 2012? 2036? 4) What are the odds that two Johns might "land" on the same world line as stated in the video? [U]According to John's statements in 2000, [/U]a "ZD" is [I][U]extremely[/U][/I] (to the point of impossibility in an infinite multiverse, I [I]assume[/I]) unlikely. Did John 1 and John 2 just win the multiverse lotto? Is there possibly a piece of the puzzle here that we are missing? 5) According to the video, the faxes were meant as a means to communicate divergence measurements. Hmmm....Have you followed up on that lead? 6) Is it now possible to look at the faxes, not as a means to "set the record straight about time travel" as the author claimed in 1998, but rather to [U][I]communicate?[/I][/U] 7) [COLOR=#ff0000][B]This is important,[/B][/COLOR] How tightly are you now holding onto your belief and theory that the faxes were telling the truth about, among other things, Y2K if their [U]actual purpose[/U] (according to the video) was to [U]communicate divergence measurements.[/U] Please remember: I am not doubting nor debating for one second that Titor was a time traveler. He was. I am merely now trying to demonstrate that the time travel question is orders of magnitude larger than you ever thought. As Ever TR [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Did John Titor prevent the Y2K event?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top