Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
Energy sources?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Einstein" data-source="post: 242327" data-attributes="member: 288"><p>The past couple of weeks I've been contemplating about the lift force generated by airplane wings. It's always vertical. The opposite direction of gravity. One could say that this lift force could actually be an anti-gravity force. But why do we choose to move the wings through the air? Why not move the air through the wings? All the resistance created using either method would create the orthogonal vertical lift force. The reason I suggested the second method is because a rotating air mass could be enclosed within a vehicle with no external visible clues as to how the vehicle would appear to rise vertically. Why did I choose a rotating air mass? We already know funnel clouds exhibit the exact claimed properties. One could call it an internally enclosed vortex engine. Sound familiar? Haven't we all read about the claimed propulsion method used by the TR-3B? A vortex engine using mercury plasma rotating at 50,000 rpm. I never gave that explanation much thought though just knowing there is no container that could hold a plasma. </p><p></p><p>So I went to YouTube to see what I could find about mercury vortex engines.</p><p></p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]bVq935K35Ug[/MEDIA]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Einstein, post: 242327, member: 288"] The past couple of weeks I've been contemplating about the lift force generated by airplane wings. It's always vertical. The opposite direction of gravity. One could say that this lift force could actually be an anti-gravity force. But why do we choose to move the wings through the air? Why not move the air through the wings? All the resistance created using either method would create the orthogonal vertical lift force. The reason I suggested the second method is because a rotating air mass could be enclosed within a vehicle with no external visible clues as to how the vehicle would appear to rise vertically. Why did I choose a rotating air mass? We already know funnel clouds exhibit the exact claimed properties. One could call it an internally enclosed vortex engine. Sound familiar? Haven't we all read about the claimed propulsion method used by the TR-3B? A vortex engine using mercury plasma rotating at 50,000 rpm. I never gave that explanation much thought though just knowing there is no container that could hold a plasma. So I went to YouTube to see what I could find about mercury vortex engines. [MEDIA=youtube]bVq935K35Ug[/MEDIA] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
Energy sources?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top