Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Artifacts & History
Evidence of Advanced Civilizations living on Earth more than 100,000 years ago?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="label" data-source="post: 235154" data-attributes="member: 5940"><p>Let's answer the questions about human remains. If I am not mistaken the human skeleton takes about 20 years to break down into absolutely nothing. In special situations a skeleton can remain intact for a much longer time. This will include the conditions it is found in. For example was it found in sand? Was it found in in with a high or a low pH level.</p><p></p><p>Simple things like this have a profound impact on how remains decompose to its most basic forms. So where are all the bodies? The majority of them would have been in water with a pH level of 8.1 and this will accelerate decomposition. Other factors like animal life must also be considered along with the health of the individual before death. </p><p></p><p>If a body is exposed to the right conditions it can lose all its tissue in less then a week. In other conditions it can survive for literally thousands of years. So in "flood conditions where there is no land it is very possible that most of the remains would have ended in the bottom of the ocean. This means the bone remains would have been gone in as little as 3 to 6 months depending. </p><p></p><p>So chances are that we will find very little human remains. </p><p></p><p>In a few post on other places I mention the importance of carbon, now the carbon you wish to look at is carbon-14. It is documented that radiocarbon analysis have trouble when the specimen is older then sixty thousand years. At this point the resolution is to poor to get a good reading. </p><p></p><p>As for land marks... Well simple truth is depending on the stone, soil any land mark will suffer Erosion. Simply stated some land marks cannot be as old as people believe them to be because they erode at many centimeters/inches every 100 years. It is true that some stone will take literally forever to erode it is not true for all types of stone. Soil on the other hand can destabilize up to ten times faster. </p><p></p><p>So when you look at the photos, ask yourself what it is that you are looking at. What is it composition and is it plausible for it to be millions if not billions of years old. </p><p></p><p>Simply summarized everything has a natural order and if someone gives you a time line of billions of years truly go and look at composition and the environment and ask yourself if it is plausible for it to be present or not. If someone gives you a carbon date, investigate the sample and if it is actually possible to truly determine date. </p><p></p><p>In the end we shouldn't accept things just on face value and what we read in books because a lot of the research that is presented as fact simply isn't and it is our responsibility to outline the deception so that science can evolve into a factual absolute truth.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="label, post: 235154, member: 5940"] Let's answer the questions about human remains. If I am not mistaken the human skeleton takes about 20 years to break down into absolutely nothing. In special situations a skeleton can remain intact for a much longer time. This will include the conditions it is found in. For example was it found in sand? Was it found in in with a high or a low pH level. Simple things like this have a profound impact on how remains decompose to its most basic forms. So where are all the bodies? The majority of them would have been in water with a pH level of 8.1 and this will accelerate decomposition. Other factors like animal life must also be considered along with the health of the individual before death. If a body is exposed to the right conditions it can lose all its tissue in less then a week. In other conditions it can survive for literally thousands of years. So in "flood conditions where there is no land it is very possible that most of the remains would have ended in the bottom of the ocean. This means the bone remains would have been gone in as little as 3 to 6 months depending. So chances are that we will find very little human remains. In a few post on other places I mention the importance of carbon, now the carbon you wish to look at is carbon-14. It is documented that radiocarbon analysis have trouble when the specimen is older then sixty thousand years. At this point the resolution is to poor to get a good reading. As for land marks... Well simple truth is depending on the stone, soil any land mark will suffer Erosion. Simply stated some land marks cannot be as old as people believe them to be because they erode at many centimeters/inches every 100 years. It is true that some stone will take literally forever to erode it is not true for all types of stone. Soil on the other hand can destabilize up to ten times faster. So when you look at the photos, ask yourself what it is that you are looking at. What is it composition and is it plausible for it to be millions if not billions of years old. Simply summarized everything has a natural order and if someone gives you a time line of billions of years truly go and look at composition and the environment and ask yourself if it is plausible for it to be present or not. If someone gives you a carbon date, investigate the sample and if it is actually possible to truly determine date. In the end we shouldn't accept things just on face value and what we read in books because a lot of the research that is presented as fact simply isn't and it is our responsibility to outline the deception so that science can evolve into a factual absolute truth. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Artifacts & History
Evidence of Advanced Civilizations living on Earth more than 100,000 years ago?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top