Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Artifacts & History
Evidence of Advanced Civilizations living on Earth more than 100,000 years ago?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MODAT7" data-source="post: 235835" data-attributes="member: 13649"><p>I've read multiple sides about a nuclear Mars incident.</p><p></p><p>Going over some of the article and tossing some ideas out...</p><p></p><p></p><p>It's called iron oxide (rust).</p><p></p><p></p><p>A natural nuclear reaction blowing up Mars as claimed isn't possible. The uranium ore that would generate this massive event would have to be weapons grade and in a very high concentration. Even if it was, it would have fissioned itself out during planetary formation. At best this would have melted rocks and made a volcano like lava flow.</p><p></p><p>Mars going dry and airless is mostly due to a lack of a magnetic field and the atomsphere being blown off into space by solar winds. This includes all the older gases. 180million years is plenty of time for a recovery from a large impact or detonation. Scientists claim Mars has been dry and lifeless for a long time, but they only have a guess and no real hard proof.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Single spots don't seem to indicate a natural process. A couple large detonations wouldn't be enough to strip the atmosphere and dry the planet.</p><p></p><p></p><p>We really don't want to meet the aliens who are capable of tera-ton level nuclear events.</p><p></p><p></p><p>If these isotopes can still be easily read in the atmosphere and on the ground from orbiters, then they happened in "recent" geological history. "Recent" is probably defined as less than 50k years. These are probably mixed with other natural radioactive sources that could skew the numbers.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Notable Xenon 129 concentrations only comes from reactors or nuclear detonations. Older Xenon 129 gasses would have been blown off into space by now by the solar winds.</p><p></p><p>If Xenon 129 really is increasing naturally, that would seem to indicate an extremely concentrated vein of uranium that is off gassing.</p><p></p><p>If Xenon 129 is increasing unnaturally, that would seem to indicate that aliens (or maybe idiot humans from the secret space force) had a meltdown in their underground reactor.</p><p></p><p></p><p>As I said before, we really don't want to meet the aliens who are capable of tera-ton level nuclear events.</p><p></p><p></p><p>"Millennia" is in the lower thousands, not millions. And he's right about the mountains. Any aliens capable of tera-ton level nuclear events would level mountains. There's no place to run or hide.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Weapons specialists tend to agree on the Xenon 129 issue. The "scientists" who deny it are the same ones who call UFO sightings just a high speed weather balloon filled with swamp gas and piloted by crash test dummies. Those dummy bastards really seem to enjoy going on joy rides in the sky.</p><p></p><p></p><p>This statement would seem to support constant bombardment by smaller nuclear devices instead of a few larger ones.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Excluding nuclear bunker busters, all the other nuclear weapons are supposed to be detonated some hundreds to thousands of feet in the air depending on the yield. Airbursts are meant to burn the ground as far as possible, not dig holes. Holes are dug by meteor impacts.</p><p></p><p>So I'm not convinced that these Xenon 129 concentrations are natural, and that's my $0.02.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MODAT7, post: 235835, member: 13649"] I've read multiple sides about a nuclear Mars incident. Going over some of the article and tossing some ideas out... It's called iron oxide (rust). A natural nuclear reaction blowing up Mars as claimed isn't possible. The uranium ore that would generate this massive event would have to be weapons grade and in a very high concentration. Even if it was, it would have fissioned itself out during planetary formation. At best this would have melted rocks and made a volcano like lava flow. Mars going dry and airless is mostly due to a lack of a magnetic field and the atomsphere being blown off into space by solar winds. This includes all the older gases. 180million years is plenty of time for a recovery from a large impact or detonation. Scientists claim Mars has been dry and lifeless for a long time, but they only have a guess and no real hard proof. Single spots don't seem to indicate a natural process. A couple large detonations wouldn't be enough to strip the atmosphere and dry the planet. We really don't want to meet the aliens who are capable of tera-ton level nuclear events. If these isotopes can still be easily read in the atmosphere and on the ground from orbiters, then they happened in "recent" geological history. "Recent" is probably defined as less than 50k years. These are probably mixed with other natural radioactive sources that could skew the numbers. Notable Xenon 129 concentrations only comes from reactors or nuclear detonations. Older Xenon 129 gasses would have been blown off into space by now by the solar winds. If Xenon 129 really is increasing naturally, that would seem to indicate an extremely concentrated vein of uranium that is off gassing. If Xenon 129 is increasing unnaturally, that would seem to indicate that aliens (or maybe idiot humans from the secret space force) had a meltdown in their underground reactor. As I said before, we really don't want to meet the aliens who are capable of tera-ton level nuclear events. "Millennia" is in the lower thousands, not millions. And he's right about the mountains. Any aliens capable of tera-ton level nuclear events would level mountains. There's no place to run or hide. Weapons specialists tend to agree on the Xenon 129 issue. The "scientists" who deny it are the same ones who call UFO sightings just a high speed weather balloon filled with swamp gas and piloted by crash test dummies. Those dummy bastards really seem to enjoy going on joy rides in the sky. This statement would seem to support constant bombardment by smaller nuclear devices instead of a few larger ones. Excluding nuclear bunker busters, all the other nuclear weapons are supposed to be detonated some hundreds to thousands of feet in the air depending on the yield. Airbursts are meant to burn the ground as far as possible, not dig holes. Holes are dug by meteor impacts. So I'm not convinced that these Xenon 129 concentrations are natural, and that's my $0.02. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Artifacts & History
Evidence of Advanced Civilizations living on Earth more than 100,000 years ago?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top