Hoo, boy, where to start.
equilibrium: a state in which opposing forces or influences are balanced.
You are looking at the "balance" wrong.
Dualism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In which context are you trying to use Dualism? Because there's more than one.
How can you do that if no one is around?
A dictaphone would do if you wanted to record the sound of it falling, but the more data the better.
You seem to be falling into the fundamental human trap of rejecting blatant patterns just because you don't want to recognize them.
speed of light in mph - Google Search
Sure looks like it is! do you know what "Never" means? It really isn't a subjective word, you know.
Congratulations, you learned to use Google's conversion function.
Now, if I have to spell it out for you, I'm saying scientists, as an international entity, use SI units, because it makes a lot of things easier and more accurate. (Like avoiding that nasty incident with the Mars Climate Orbiter when someone forgot to send the memo to the Americans)
Most US scientists have adopted SI units, but some stubborn people refuse to keep up with the times.
Mars Climate Orbiter - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Maybe you should look more into it. Turtle island, dude.
See my earlier comment of "Turtles all the way down!"
"And now you're just becoming incoherent again. "
Nope, plenty coherent, you can not measure incoherence just by your inability to comprehend the meaning of something.
Incoherent:
- (of spoken or written language) expressed in an incomprehensible or confusing way; unclear. <---- This one
- (of waves) having no definite or stable phase relationship.
"Also, Gauge theory deals with fields, which has nothing to do with whether or not parallel lines meet, converge or diverge."
Noether's theorem - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Noether's (first) theorem states that any
differentiablesymmetry of the
action of a physical system has a corresponding
conservation law.
"Zeno's Paradoxes were solved with the advent of modern calculus, so they no longer really apply outside of Philosophy. It's also worth noting that the universe is
not in equilibrium"
Conservation law - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Fermat's principle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Unless you somehow created an interdimensional portal to a universe with non-euclidean geometry, "
Kerr metric - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hyperbolic Geometry - EscherMath
Klein quartic - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You can link all the random articles you like, it's not going to make you seem any more intelligent. (See my post about technobabble)
Ctrl+F "an answer" <NOT FOUND>
"
Forget about theory."
"Focus on the Mathematics !"
Well, that just about sums up that site, doesn't it? (Hint, what do you think we use to build theories? Wishes and duct tape are not the answer. Also, your mass of the Earth is wrong by a large margin, so I didn't even bother to check the rest of the values)
Seriously, all I want is to have an intelligent, coherent discussion with you, but you're making it very difficult by acting this way. Debunking people who are hilariously wrong is fun, but it's more fun to learn from each other and have a constructive discussion. Can't we just do that? Let's start over and talk about theories of how you could time travel instead. You can even go first! Just don't post any trippy photos or huge blocks of numbers without at least a paragraph of explanation about what they're supposed to mean.
"A dictaphone would do if you wanted to record the sound of it falling, but the more data the better."
A dictaphone would be something. Can't have something if there's no one. Can't have someone place and operate or read a dictophone if there's no one around.
"In which context are you trying to use Dualism? Because there's more than one."
Obviously the one most relevant to "balance"
"Now, if I have to spell it out for you,"
Nope, you don't, so stop being so condescending. You were blatantly ignoring something just because you didn't want to acknowledge it. Units are units are units. Measurements are relative.
"Incoherent:
- (of spoken or written language) expressed in an incomprehensible or confusing way; unclear. "
"Nope, plenty coherent, you can not measure incoherence just by your inability to comprehend the meaning of something."
"You can link all the random articles you like"
Except it isn't random, you are just choosing to ignore the relevance.
"Well, that just about sums up that site, doesn't it?"
Nope, this sentence and your dismissive behaviour completely sums up your callow attitude and approach to a situation and discussion. I will have no further conversation with someone with selective reading who dismisses whatsoever they wish solely because they refuse to see the relevance.
"Ctrl+F "interbeing""
"Ctrl+F "an answer""
"When we look deeply into a flower, we see the elements that have come together to allow it to manifest. We can see clouds manifesting as rain. Without the rain, nothing can grow. When I touch the flower, I’m touching the cloud and touching the rain. This is not just poetry, it’s reality. If we take the clouds and the rain out of the flower, the flower will not be there. With the eye of the Buddha, we are able to see the clouds and the rain in the flower. We can touch the sun without burning our fingers. Without the sun nothing can grow, so it’s not possible to take the sun out of the flower. The flower cannot be as a separate entity; it has to inter-be with the light, with the clouds, with the rain. The word “interbeing” is closer to reality that the word “being.” Being really means interbeing.
The same is true for me, for you, and for the Buddha. The Buddha has to inter-be with everything. Interbeing and nonself are the objects of our contemplation. We have to train ourselves so that in our daily lives we can touch the truth of interbeing and nonself in every moment. You are in touch with the clouds, with the rain, with the children, with the trees, with the rivers, with your planet, and that contact reveals the true nature of reality, the nature of impermanence, nonself, interdependence, and interbeing."
