Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
HDR Operator Development Research
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sonix" data-source="post: 188203" data-attributes="member: 10954"><p>My line of thinking, when developing the experiment, is that although theoretically (according to the suggestions of the findings of Remote Viewing studies) we should be able to target anywhere/anywhen, and that there is benefit with random targets for the purpose of evaluating method, that there is practical need for, and might be advantage to, having a well-defined target. With RV studies, there is benefit to the target being random - it eliminates other possible sources of information such as psychic access to the knowledge of the experimenter or general sense of the longitude/latitude of geographical areas if real coordinates were used, and it forces the viewer to fall back on RV skills, not imagination or speculation - but for practical purposes nobody would intend to use the skill for random viewing. As soon as you introduce intention re the target, as soon as the lone experimenter wants to RV a specific distant time/place, then the issue arises that the viewer's presumptions, wishful thinking, etc, about the target can overlay and distort any real information gleaned (and even moreso with the HDR, as that means you may be specifically targeting a timeline/parallel in which those presumptions etc are true). So the trick is to be able to target a time/place but eliminate as best as can the possibility of being able to deduce or imagine what it is about that time/place that you want to determine (I'm talking Mental travel, not Physical travel). The most specific time/place target I could think of was to use myself and the HDR on a particular date as the target. I could target specific instances in the past because I log the sessions and take a selfie at the beginning of a session. I could set a schedule for future sessions, so I could target specific dates in the future. This quickly brought to mind that it would be like using the HDR and scheduled structured sessions like a pair of walkie-talkies talking between past and future dates. So each month I have a set 5 day stretch during which I target a scheduled session one month in the future with the intention to Receive; each month I also have a 5 day stretch during which I target a completed session one month previous and focusing, with visual cues, on the information that I want to Send to that past session.</p><p></p><p>Again, for me, a problem with random is it has no practical purpose other than proving the efficiency of the procedure. So my idea is to target future information unavailable until that future date immediately prior to my Send sessions (lets say the symbol of a stock that meets very specific performance criteria on a date in the future) and camouflage it with random - encrypt it. I use cards designed to teach children the alphabet, so each letter has a visual. With a Receive session, immediately following the HDR session I dowse the pack of alphabet cards for what letters were components of the signal just received. Following this, I generate a random number between 1 and 25. This uses a simple code method. If 1 then each letter decodes to 1 letter following (so A becomes B), 2 then 2 letters following (A becomes C), etc. So I then decode the letters I've dowsed using the freshly generated code. With the Send sessions, I know the information I want to send. With each Send session I encode the letters I want to send using the key generated on the date I want to send it to and focus on the cards that represent those letters during the Send session. What this means is that, for practical purposes, even though for 5 days running I am sending the same stock symbol to 5 dates in the past, on each of these 5 Send dates I am sending different, randomized-through-encoding, letters. So with my Receive sessions my brain can't speculate that I've received a B yesterday and so favor a B today, as there is no deducible relation between the signals from one day to the next (other than found after applying keys generated after each session). It means, as well, that I can analyze 5 days of sessions to find significant recurrences of decoded letters. Following the 5 Receive sessions I look for patterns in what was received and settle on the most probable practical interpretation of the result - which cannot be evaluated until a month later. I've also, over time, introduced a Null signal, to be used when no stock, for example, meets the set criteria.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sonix, post: 188203, member: 10954"] My line of thinking, when developing the experiment, is that although theoretically (according to the suggestions of the findings of Remote Viewing studies) we should be able to target anywhere/anywhen, and that there is benefit with random targets for the purpose of evaluating method, that there is practical need for, and might be advantage to, having a well-defined target. With RV studies, there is benefit to the target being random - it eliminates other possible sources of information such as psychic access to the knowledge of the experimenter or general sense of the longitude/latitude of geographical areas if real coordinates were used, and it forces the viewer to fall back on RV skills, not imagination or speculation - but for practical purposes nobody would intend to use the skill for random viewing. As soon as you introduce intention re the target, as soon as the lone experimenter wants to RV a specific distant time/place, then the issue arises that the viewer's presumptions, wishful thinking, etc, about the target can overlay and distort any real information gleaned (and even moreso with the HDR, as that means you may be specifically targeting a timeline/parallel in which those presumptions etc are true). So the trick is to be able to target a time/place but eliminate as best as can the possibility of being able to deduce or imagine what it is about that time/place that you want to determine (I'm talking Mental travel, not Physical travel). The most specific time/place target I could think of was to use myself and the HDR on a particular date as the target. I could target specific instances in the past because I log the sessions and take a selfie at the beginning of a session. I could set a schedule for future sessions, so I could target specific dates in the future. This quickly brought to mind that it would be like using the HDR and scheduled structured sessions like a pair of walkie-talkies talking between past and future dates. So each month I have a set 5 day stretch during which I target a scheduled session one month in the future with the intention to Receive; each month I also have a 5 day stretch during which I target a completed session one month previous and focusing, with visual cues, on the information that I want to Send to that past session. Again, for me, a problem with random is it has no practical purpose other than proving the efficiency of the procedure. So my idea is to target future information unavailable until that future date immediately prior to my Send sessions (lets say the symbol of a stock that meets very specific performance criteria on a date in the future) and camouflage it with random - encrypt it. I use cards designed to teach children the alphabet, so each letter has a visual. With a Receive session, immediately following the HDR session I dowse the pack of alphabet cards for what letters were components of the signal just received. Following this, I generate a random number between 1 and 25. This uses a simple code method. If 1 then each letter decodes to 1 letter following (so A becomes B), 2 then 2 letters following (A becomes C), etc. So I then decode the letters I've dowsed using the freshly generated code. With the Send sessions, I know the information I want to send. With each Send session I encode the letters I want to send using the key generated on the date I want to send it to and focus on the cards that represent those letters during the Send session. What this means is that, for practical purposes, even though for 5 days running I am sending the same stock symbol to 5 dates in the past, on each of these 5 Send dates I am sending different, randomized-through-encoding, letters. So with my Receive sessions my brain can't speculate that I've received a B yesterday and so favor a B today, as there is no deducible relation between the signals from one day to the next (other than found after applying keys generated after each session). It means, as well, that I can analyze 5 days of sessions to find significant recurrences of decoded letters. Following the 5 Receive sessions I look for patterns in what was received and settle on the most probable practical interpretation of the result - which cannot be evaluated until a month later. I've also, over time, introduced a Null signal, to be used when no stock, for example, meets the set criteria. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
HDR Operator Development Research
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top