Hey

He ended up following my profile and started a conversation with me. He made a couple of initial comments but never answered anything.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1361.webp
    IMG_1361.webp
    50.3 KB · Views: 1
  • IMG_1362.webp
    IMG_1362.webp
    35.2 KB · Views: 1
I inquired with AI regarding CERN trying to create black holes. Maybe a major upgrade to the facility would permit further research into black holes.

AI

CERN's experiments, particularly those involving the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), have not been close to creating a black hole in any dangerous or concerning way. While theoretical physics suggests that it is possible to create microscopic black holes under certain extreme conditions, these would be extremely small and short-lived.

Here are some important points:

1. Micro Black Holes: If micro black holes were to be created at the LHC, they would be incredibly small, on the order of the Planck scale. They would evaporate almost instantaneously due to Hawking radiation, a theoretical prediction by physicist Stephen Hawking.

2. Safety Studies: Extensive safety studies were conducted before the LHC was brought online. These studies concluded that any black holes potentially created would pose no threat. They would decay rapidly and would not be able to grow or cause any harm.

3. Cosmic Ray Comparisons: Nature constantly creates high-energy collisions in the upper atmosphere that are far more powerful than those produced in the LHC. These collisions have not led to the creation of dangerous black holes, providing further reassurance that the LHC's operations are safe.
In summary, while the idea of creating black holes in a laboratory setting is a fascinating topic in theoretical physics, the practical reality is that any such black holes produced at CERN would be harmless and short-lived, posing no threat to the Earth or its inhabitants.
 
As I recall this story was from the early 2000's. I believe John predicted a miniature black hole would be created by CERN within a year at the time he wrote it. He also predicted weekly WACO type events by the government against the citizenry. John was unsuccessful at predicting any future events.
Incorrect.
 
His description of the time machine does suggest he has no science background at all. Just a hodge podge of incompatible ideas that aren't even fact. Please realize that his prediction that CERN was on the verge of creating miniature black holes never came true.
Opinionated beliefs are further more those who only see science as textbook; in your case.
 
His description of the time machine does suggest he has no science background at all. Just a hodge podge of incompatible ideas that aren't even fact. Please realize that his prediction that CERN was on the verge of creating miniature black holes never came true.
What do you consider as affirmative scientific background?

Academic?

Also, you have no idea what cern has, you're just spewing conjuncture.

Einstein theory of relativity, is still just a theory.
E=mc nothing, because it's not a fully proven process.
It's just a basis for the scientific community to go off of until they find something more suitable for quantum mechanical engineering.

Please, sit down....have a coffee.
 
If you believe Einstein actually solved the theoretical process of relativity and gravity, then you're probably stuck in a 1970 college textbook.

You won't get to Mars in two hours with that theory...
 

Top