Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
Hollow Earth Theory!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ironside100" data-source="post: 29623" data-attributes="member: 534"><p><strong>Re: !!!THEORY!!!</strong></p><p></p><p>lovely response Fanavans</p><p> </p><p>You are right in saying that new theories are often mocked and not taken seriously precisely because they are new and break the mould. I believe it is just the conservative nature of humanity to scrutinise anything new that may change the status quo. However Hollow Earth theory is not a new idea it is a very old idea (seems Edmund Halley first suggested it in 1692) so comparing it to a new ground breaking theory I find inappropriate.</p><p> </p><p>Once again I must agree that today most research is driven by a desire for fame and fortune but there is little alternative. The technological and financial requirements to begin a major research project cannot be matched by one man working in his garden shed. This is not to say that modern science is corrupt and covering up facts to the public. True things should be questioned at all times otherwise how else are we to discern truth for fiction? But with this knowledge we should try to offer alternatives also based upon fact and evidence, you say we are not bound by the same requirements as science but I believe these requirements that you refer to are universal in nature and is applicable to everyone not just the scientific community. One example would be peer review, we are all judged by our contempories with what ever idea we put forward this is just common sense, who else would be qualified enough to judge our actions other than our peers? One of the main requirements that you seem to be claiming we are not bound by is presenting suitable evidence. The idea</p><p>that we can make "far fetched solid arguments" without evidence is ludicrous and it is this which I find lacking with this hollow Earth theory.</p><p> </p><p>There have been several expeditions to the poles including some specifically designed to go looking for the so called holes in the cap (this include the American Antarctica expedition of 1838). There have also been satellite photos that measure polar melting no of which have found any holes.The NASA photograph showing a black hole at the North Pole is actually a composite of several pictures taken over 24 hours so that all sections can be seen in daylight and the black hole at the top was the portion of the arctic circle never illuminated during the day over winter months. </p><p> </p><p>True there are still some ancient puzzles that have yet to be solved and im totally with you on that one but I dont think this is one of them as some ancient problems defy modern scientific explanation this one however does not, we have a useful provable theory backed up but evidence in the form of plate tectonics (soon to be replaced with the theory of mantle dynamics).</p><p> </p><p>Its lovely to see some latin getting thrown into this debate but when I said superstition I meant it to be taken in its modern context, to quote websters dictionary for a moment "a notion maintained despite evidence to the contrary".</p><p> </p><p>I will have a go at making my own review of hollow earth theory using fanavans simplified layout that he used for plate tectonics:</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>AIM: To explore the makeup of the centre of the earth.</p><p> </p><p>Hypothises: That the center of the earth is hollow.</p><p> </p><p>Method: none, base upon 300 year old theory with little to no evidence.</p><p> </p><p>Result: Findings goes against other more believable results but believe it anyway because modern science has an agenda and it goes against mainstream thinking which means it must have some hidden truth or there is a cover up.....or aliens have zapped my brain and shown me the earth is actually made of hard boiled eggs and nuts.</p><p> </p><p>Conclusion: The Earth is hollow.</p><p> </p><p>Finally I thought we where Homo Sapiens rather than Neaderthals but once again im ignorant of the subject please correct me if im wrong here.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ironside100, post: 29623, member: 534"] [b]Re: !!!THEORY!!![/b] lovely response Fanavans You are right in saying that new theories are often mocked and not taken seriously precisely because they are new and break the mould. I believe it is just the conservative nature of humanity to scrutinise anything new that may change the status quo. However Hollow Earth theory is not a new idea it is a very old idea (seems Edmund Halley first suggested it in 1692) so comparing it to a new ground breaking theory I find inappropriate. Once again I must agree that today most research is driven by a desire for fame and fortune but there is little alternative. The technological and financial requirements to begin a major research project cannot be matched by one man working in his garden shed. This is not to say that modern science is corrupt and covering up facts to the public. True things should be questioned at all times otherwise how else are we to discern truth for fiction? But with this knowledge we should try to offer alternatives also based upon fact and evidence, you say we are not bound by the same requirements as science but I believe these requirements that you refer to are universal in nature and is applicable to everyone not just the scientific community. One example would be peer review, we are all judged by our contempories with what ever idea we put forward this is just common sense, who else would be qualified enough to judge our actions other than our peers? One of the main requirements that you seem to be claiming we are not bound by is presenting suitable evidence. The idea that we can make "far fetched solid arguments" without evidence is ludicrous and it is this which I find lacking with this hollow Earth theory. There have been several expeditions to the poles including some specifically designed to go looking for the so called holes in the cap (this include the American Antarctica expedition of 1838). There have also been satellite photos that measure polar melting no of which have found any holes.The NASA photograph showing a black hole at the North Pole is actually a composite of several pictures taken over 24 hours so that all sections can be seen in daylight and the black hole at the top was the portion of the arctic circle never illuminated during the day over winter months. True there are still some ancient puzzles that have yet to be solved and im totally with you on that one but I dont think this is one of them as some ancient problems defy modern scientific explanation this one however does not, we have a useful provable theory backed up but evidence in the form of plate tectonics (soon to be replaced with the theory of mantle dynamics). Its lovely to see some latin getting thrown into this debate but when I said superstition I meant it to be taken in its modern context, to quote websters dictionary for a moment "a notion maintained despite evidence to the contrary". I will have a go at making my own review of hollow earth theory using fanavans simplified layout that he used for plate tectonics: AIM: To explore the makeup of the centre of the earth. Hypothises: That the center of the earth is hollow. Method: none, base upon 300 year old theory with little to no evidence. Result: Findings goes against other more believable results but believe it anyway because modern science has an agenda and it goes against mainstream thinking which means it must have some hidden truth or there is a cover up.....or aliens have zapped my brain and shown me the earth is actually made of hard boiled eggs and nuts. Conclusion: The Earth is hollow. Finally I thought we where Homo Sapiens rather than Neaderthals but once again im ignorant of the subject please correct me if im wrong here. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
Hollow Earth Theory!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top