Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
How does one convert matter into energy?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="start at edge" data-source="post: 232005" data-attributes="member: 11971"><p>I’ll refer to your initial question of this thread and I’ll say (write) relatively little:</p><p>Any oxidation process (burning process) is defined by transforming matter (mass) into energy (heat). Depending on what burns, the amount of energy released is on a scale from very little to very high. There are also materials that do not burn from the classical point of view, but ALL matter can “burn” once you get at sub-atomic level. Burning does not involve only the “fuel” (gasoline for example) but also the sustainer (oxygen). Burning processes can be stretched over time (slow - wood for example) or very fast (violent (explosion) – dynamite for example). There are also some materials that burn/explode in vacuum where there is no oxygen – those are the materials that in the burning/exploding process create themselves the sustainer (oxygen). If we refer to the above mentioned as “classical” burning processes, then they all generate other residual matter as well (smoke for example) besides the energy (heat) released. And here we step on sub-atomic ground (nuclear explosion for example). These type of “burning” processes do not need a sustainer such as oxygen, because the “split” is not at molecular level (for example both gasoline and oxygen are made of molecules) but sub-atomic – in the nucleus. In these cases, the burning residue is not matter (such as smoke or carbon dioxide) but radiation. The last category I’ll mention is the “cleanest” one – matter (mass) is consumed IN TOTALITY, WITHOUT any residual matter or radiation, that is – ALL the mass is converted into energy: matter-antimatter interaction, which is the most “efficient” and “clean”, consuming all the mass involved and releasing the maximum energy possible, no residual mass or radiation.</p><p>All these things are already well known, especially in the scientific communities and they are not only achievable but they also happen all the time, whether in nature, in some laboratory or in outer space. The big deal and the big question that I have is complementary:</p><p>How to convert energy into mass (at a reasonable level, say … more than 70%) ???</p><p>When (and if) somebody has an answer, even a partial one – a hint, I am the first who wants to know, as it is the missing piece of what may be the most interesting puzzle ever.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="start at edge, post: 232005, member: 11971"] I’ll refer to your initial question of this thread and I’ll say (write) relatively little: Any oxidation process (burning process) is defined by transforming matter (mass) into energy (heat). Depending on what burns, the amount of energy released is on a scale from very little to very high. There are also materials that do not burn from the classical point of view, but ALL matter can “burn” once you get at sub-atomic level. Burning does not involve only the “fuel” (gasoline for example) but also the sustainer (oxygen). Burning processes can be stretched over time (slow - wood for example) or very fast (violent (explosion) – dynamite for example). There are also some materials that burn/explode in vacuum where there is no oxygen – those are the materials that in the burning/exploding process create themselves the sustainer (oxygen). If we refer to the above mentioned as “classical” burning processes, then they all generate other residual matter as well (smoke for example) besides the energy (heat) released. And here we step on sub-atomic ground (nuclear explosion for example). These type of “burning” processes do not need a sustainer such as oxygen, because the “split” is not at molecular level (for example both gasoline and oxygen are made of molecules) but sub-atomic – in the nucleus. In these cases, the burning residue is not matter (such as smoke or carbon dioxide) but radiation. The last category I’ll mention is the “cleanest” one – matter (mass) is consumed IN TOTALITY, WITHOUT any residual matter or radiation, that is – ALL the mass is converted into energy: matter-antimatter interaction, which is the most “efficient” and “clean”, consuming all the mass involved and releasing the maximum energy possible, no residual mass or radiation. All these things are already well known, especially in the scientific communities and they are not only achievable but they also happen all the time, whether in nature, in some laboratory or in outer space. The big deal and the big question that I have is complementary: How to convert energy into mass (at a reasonable level, say … more than 70%) ??? When (and if) somebody has an answer, even a partial one – a hint, I am the first who wants to know, as it is the missing piece of what may be the most interesting puzzle ever. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
How does one convert matter into energy?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top