Is our Sun a planet, hollow, not hot, and inhabited on and within?

[Max X]

Is our Sun a planet, hollow, not hot, and inhabited on and within?

What is really behind the Sun’s warmth, its sunlight and heat? Why, to the human perception, does the sun seem to be just a gigantic fireball?


It is evident that for centuries the human mind has been purposely rendered blind to Earth's, the Sun's and the universe spiritual nature.


NASA has been brushing photos and doctoring pictures of planets of the Solar System producing fake evidence of the whole System for decades, not to mention moon's facts and fake pictures which is really artificial, inhabited, hollow and/or dragged in place a long time ago.

Trusting NASA to supply us with straight forward information and honest photos is like letting the wolf babysit little red riding hood. For instance there is plenty of evidence the sky over Mars is not yellow but blue, and that the planet is not that red.

The fact is that they receive money from the so-called government so if any of them dare publish the true facts they may lose not only their grants but their jobs too, so they lie.

They have also published some brown pictures of the Jupiter moon Ganymede, yet real photos prove the largest moon of the Solar System is like Earth, a blue-green object.

There is scientific evidence, collected by independent researchers; all planets of our Solar System are glowing more than ever.

Why?

If we want to reach a higher level and freedom from the illusion of limitations, it is essential to have an appreciation of the real nature of the sun, and the universe as a whole, to be conscious of their spiritual signification.

The sun and its harmony is perceived by us as light, heat and warmth yet the sun, with oceans, mountains, flora and fauna is an advanced planet contributing to the spiritual transformation of the whole Solar System into a better reality: the gradual ascension of the whole System.

So don't believe what Al Gore says.

 

[Max X]

Re: Is our Sun a planet, hollow, not hot, and inhabited on and within?

These are scientifc facts related to the great transformation of the Solar System (instigated mostly by the Sun)

From David Wilcock website www.divinecosmos.com

..................................................

SUN: The Sun’s magnetic field is over 230 percent stronger now than it was at the beginning of the 1900s, and its overall energetic activity has sizably increased, creating a frenzy of activity.

VENUS: Venus is now glowing in the dark, as is Jupiter’s moon Io.

EARTH: In the last 30 years, Earth’s icecaps have thinned out by as much as 40 percent. Quite inexplicably, just since 1997 the structure of the Earth has shifted from being slightly more egg-shaped, or elongated at the poles, to more pumpkin-shaped, or flattened at the poles.

MARS: The icecaps of Mars noticeably melted just within one year, causing 50-percent changes in surface features. Atmospheric density had risen by 200 percent above previous observations as of 1997.

JUPITER: Jupiter has become so highly energized that it is now surrounded by a visibly glowing donut tube of energy in the path of the moon Io. The size of Jupiter’s magnetic field has more than doubled since 1992.

SATURN: Saturn’s polar regions have been noticeably brightening, and its magnetic field strength increasing.

URANUS: Uranus and Neptune both appear to have had recent magnetic pole shifts – 60 degrees for Uranus and 50 for Neptune.

NEPTUNE: Neptune has become 40 percent brighter in infrared since 1996, and is fully 100-percent brighter in certain areas. Also, Neptune’s moon Triton has had a “very large percentage increase” in atmospheric pressure and temperature, comparable to a 22-degree Fahrenheit increase on Earth.

PLUTO: As of September 2002, Pluto has experienced a 300-percent increase in its atmospheric pressure in the last 14 years, while also becoming noticeably darker in color.

 

[kahotep]

The Iron Sun Theory

Max,

I think its interesting that you bring up this subject, as I find it popping up in my thoughts from time to time as well. Many of our ideas of the Sun are very old, going all of the way back to the time of Leonardo da Vinci.

Based on his primitive telescope observations thought that the sun was a ball of gas. While there may be gasses in the photosphere of the Sun; what many researchers fail to consider, is the possibility that the photosphere may a mere atmospheric layer covering a more solid layer.

One of my central understandings, regarding humanity's understanding of the physical world around them, is the notion that we often go too-far with our conclusions. A look through history shows all manner of theories, which were widely believed by the researchers of the day; but eventually they realize that they went too far with too little information backing their conclusions and it all falls apart. In addition, once something is accepted as "truth," it is very difficult to change those beliefs, even with facts.

What starts to happen after many other theories have incorporated the ideas of a popular theory, is "if the facts don't fit the model, discard the facts."

I'd like to share with everyone a theory about the Sun which has some compelling scientific research backing it. Indeed, much of what has been observed about the Sun backs this alternative theory, as opposed to the gaseous (H + He) sun model.

I would like to direct you to these sites for information about a promising theory:

The Sun is a ball of Iron!

The surface of the Sun:* The sun has a rigid iron surface located under the photosphere that is revealed by satellite imagery.* The solar surface sits beneath the sun's visible photosphere and is electrically active.

The Sun: A Great Ball Of Iron?

ScienceDaily (July 17, 2002) — For years, scientists have assumed that the sun is an enormous mass of hydrogen. But in a paper presented before the American Astronomical Society, Dr. Oliver Manuel, a professor of nuclear chemistry at UMR, says iron, not hydrogen, is the sun's most abundant element.

Manuel claims that hydrogen fusion creates some of the sun's heat, as hydrogen -- the lightest of all elements -- moves to the sun's surface. But most of the heat comes from the core of an exploded supernova that continues to generate energy within the iron-rich interior of the sun, Manuel says.

"We think that the solar system came from a single star, and the sun formed on a collapsed supernova core," Manuel says. "The inner planets are made mostly of matter produced in the inner part of that star, and the outer planets of material form the outer layers of that star."

Manuel's theory that the solar system was born catastrophically out of a supernova goes against the widely-held belief among astrophysicists that the sun and planets were formed 4.5 billion years ago in a relatively ambiguous cloud of interstellar dust. Iron and the heavy element known as xenon are at the center of Manuel's efforts to change the way people think about the solar system's origins.

Born of a supernova

Manuel believes a supernova rocked our area of the Milky Way galaxy some five billion years ago, giving birth to all the heavenly bodies that populate the solar system.

Analyses of meteorites reveal that all primordial helium is accompanied by "strange xenon," he says, adding that both helium and strange xenon came from the outer layer of the supernova that created the solar system. Helium and strange xenon are also seen together in Jupiter.

Manuel has spent the better part of his 40-year scientific career trying to convince others of his hypothesis. Back in 1975, Manuel and another UMR researcher, Dr. Dwarka Das Sabu, first proposed that the solar system formed from the debris of a spinning star that exploded as a supernova. They based their claim on studies of meteorites and moon samples which showed traces of strange xenon.

Data from NASA's Galileo probe of Jupiter's helium-rich atmosphere in 1996 reveals traces of strange xenon gases -- solid evidence against the conventional model of the solar system's creation, Manuel says.

 

[Max X]

Re: Is our Sun a planet, hollow, not hot, and inhabited on and within?



Very well said Kahotep.


There are many cosmological secrets and mysteries still unknown to advanced thinkers, much less to the common man, and to the materialistic scientist.


The evidence shows that on one hand we have been lied to by the so-called scientists who are under the boot of evil governments who want to keep the population in ignorance, and on the other hand those scientist’ materialistic approach to research keep them from seeing the big picture beyond the illusion of limitations.

Their problem is that they are looking for material causes in a mental, spiritual universe. For instance the scientific evidence shows: the Sun’s magnetic field is over 230 percent stronger now than it was at the beginning of the 1900s, and its overall energetic activity has sizably increased, creating a frenzy of activity.

I believe the sun is not a ball of gas and fire, as the evidence from Dr. Manuel shows, but that it is solid, not hot, most probably inhabited and, as all moons, planets and stars are: perfectly hollow.

Take for instance the newly discovered fact that the Earth is expanding, and that therefore Earth must be hollow, (because it would not expand otherwise) that 200 million years ago the planet was a little bigger than the moon. (see the book The Land of no Horizon)

Yet people are not allowed to read or to see that sort of ground braking scientific discoveries on TV documentaries or in school textbooks.

Why?

Is the sun extra energy and activity premeditated, is RA actually working overtime to set free its children from the New World Order madness?