Is there a practice or trend of approaching scientific topics from a non scientific perspective?

I thought Cain killing Abel fueled the origin of death and war. And Jesus in Matthew 10:34 saying he brought a sword instead of peace fueled wars started by Christians.
Regarding the tower I think we know Shem lineage leads to Jesus so he would be spared from consequences of the Tower punishment. And the origin of the Hebrew language may have had special treatment. History that old is most people’s guess. Whoever owns history in 2036 controls todays events as told in 2036.

Shem's Line (Godly Lineage):


  • Some Jewish traditions suggest that the descendants of Shem, Noah's son, who were seen as the "righteous" lineage, may have distanced themselves from the rebellious builders. However, this is not explicitly mentioned in Genesis.

Eber (Ancestor of the Hebrews):


  • The name "Hebrew" (derived from Eber) appears later in the Bible. Some speculate that Eber and his descendants may have been less affected, as their language (believed to be a precursor to Hebrew) could have been preserved. However, this is based on conjecture rather than biblical evidence.
 
Regardless of Cain or Jesus quote Isaiah 45:7 was exposed to me a few years ago which I had no idea. So I have had to discern if the bad was bad bad or good bad paraphrasing

The verse where God declares that He creates both good and evil is found in Isaiah 45:7. Here is the verse in different translations:

- King James Version (KJV):
"I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things."

- New International Version (NIV):
"I form the light and create darkness, I bring prosperity and create disaster; I, the Lord, do all these things."

- English Standard Version (ESV):
"I form light and create darkness; I make well-being and create calamity; I am the Lord, who does all these things."

---

### Context and Meaning
The Hebrew word translated as "evil" in the KJV is "ra" (רָע), which can mean:
  • Moral evil or wickedness.
  • Calamity, disaster, or misfortune.

In the context of Isaiah 45, the verse does not refer to moral evil but to God's sovereignty over all aspects of existence, including both blessings and judgments. The passage emphasizes that God is in control of both creation's harmony (light, peace, prosperity) and its disruptions (darkness, calamity, disaster).

### Context of Isaiah 45
This chapter addresses Cyrus, the Persian king whom God has chosen to deliver Israel from captivity. The message highlights God's supreme authority over history and the universe, asserting that even calamity or disaster serves His purposes.

---

### Interpretation
  • Theological Perspective: God is sovereign and has authority over everything, including what humans perceive as good and bad.
  • Moral Evil: The text does not imply that God causes people to commit sin but rather that He allows or orchestrates events, including judgments or calamities, to fulfill His plans.

This verse illustrates God's ultimate control over the balance of life and His ability to use both blessings and hardships for His divine purposes.
 
I was born into Protestantism. Baptist. My first wife was Catholic. So I experienced division in that. And future decisions based on religion choices. The verses around Matthew 10:34 have always been divisive verses to me. It’s like your interpretation of Jesus and God is different from mine so let’s war over it, paraphrasing.
 
Considering the Nobel prize awarded in recent years for proving or providing significant science that existence does not exist beyond our experience environment, can you and I prove that the other exists without visual interaction and does that even prove existence?
 
It does seem as if mankind has created division at every corner.

My personal religion comes from the following story. Since religion is a belief anyway:

 
Ah. Coexistence with humans. There’s a few who choose to. It’s easy to disappear among 8 billion. I choose to coexist from a spiritual perspective that connects all things. Humans don’t know that practice very well. I can relate to various content of the audiobook due to experiences many don’t have nor choose to explore the reality of them. If I get to meet Haber to discuss creating the story perhaps the story will be different from the previous version.
 
Hmm. Years ago associating the onomy of Astronomy and Deuteronomy I assumed deuteronomy was the Study of some topic. But apparently the two suffixes don’t seem to be similar. In regards to your Phil-osophy comment.

"Einstein’s later works on general relativity served as a kind of Deuteronomy for the Theory of Relativity, reiterating and refining the principles he first introduced in his groundbreaking 1905 papers."
 
SergiusPaulus said:
Is there a practice or trend of approaching scientific topics from a non scientific perspective?
Would unrelated approaches to certain topics like time travel and others provide breakthroughs.
Click to expand...
Of course. Scientists and Religionists, etc , often rely overly much on lower intellect, in an arrogant and ignorant way. They use one half of their minds in an imbalanced way. They tend to disregard such things as intuition, direct knowing and various methods of thought and awareness. Even with the relatively high IQs that some of these people have, compared to others, they often invent and adhere to a lot of false theories, dogmas and ideas.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Odrade said:
Of course. Scientists and Religionists, etc , often rely overly much on lower intellect, in an arrogant and ignorant way. They use one half of their minds in an imbalanced way. They tend to disregard such things as intuition, direct knowing and various methods of thought and awareness. Even with the relatively high IQs that some of these people have, compared to others, they often invent and adhere to a lot of false theories, dogmas and ideas.
Click to expand...
Half mind/half brain? Does ambidextria have an advantage over those who aren’t ambidextrous? What stimulates little known areas of the mind?
 

Top