Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
John Titor = John Tooker?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Einstein" data-source="post: 53954" data-attributes="member: 288"><p>Gravity Probe B was an experiment designed to test relativity.</p><p><a href="http://einstein.stanford.edu/" target="_blank">Gravity Probe B: Testing Einstein's Universe</a></p><p>I have been following the release of data on this experiment ever since it completed. Initially the results indicated only a partial success for confirmation of general relativity. Now the results appear to be right in line with general relativity. Kind of like they used a shoe stretcher to make the data conform to general relativity.</p><p> </p><p>I could almost write a book on fudging like this. I would call it "The Decline of Science."</p><p>The first chapter would be exposing the truth about equalities. Or should I say "Making the unequal become equal."</p><p>The second chapter would cover replacing facts with theories.</p><p>The third chapter would be the "Constant" deception.</p><p>The fourth chapter be " The concept of Mass (A lie)"</p><p>I could keep going with this....</p><p> </p><p>Let's start by taking a look at the fine structure constant. Did you know it's been around since 1916? A constant derived from other constants. Even the speed of light is incorporated into the fine structure constant. So if one of those constants is shown to actually be variable, the fine structure constants value would change as well. I picked the speed of light constant because experimental observations do exist that show the speed of light is not constant. The spectral lines of hydrogen from our own sun are red-shifted. That's a fact. So it appears that the speed of light from our own sun is traveling slower towards us than the speed of light here on earth. That kind of throws a monkey wrench in the speed of light being a constant, which appears to me to be a lie.</p><p> </p><p>Here on the earth lightning is due to a displacement of charge. Which doesn't stay that way for very long. It appears that voltage potentials get high enough so that everything behaves as a conductor, and then a discharge condition prevails. Titor says his miniature black holes remain stable by continuously injecting electrons into them. That would indicate a buildup of charge would occur. Eventually in the real world that you and I live in, a discharge will occur. That is part of the real physics that Titor didn't seem to understand. And if your credentials are real, then I am having a bit of difficulty in understanding why you don't understand that Titor's machine is merely just a fictional concept.</p><p> </p><p>The Tipler sinusoid drawing is what you must be referring to as the schematic. Something he borrowed to tell his story. But if you ever do come up with any "Facts" to defend Titor's story, I would love to see them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Einstein, post: 53954, member: 288"] Gravity Probe B was an experiment designed to test relativity. [url="http://einstein.stanford.edu/"]Gravity Probe B: Testing Einstein's Universe[/url] I have been following the release of data on this experiment ever since it completed. Initially the results indicated only a partial success for confirmation of general relativity. Now the results appear to be right in line with general relativity. Kind of like they used a shoe stretcher to make the data conform to general relativity. I could almost write a book on fudging like this. I would call it "The Decline of Science." The first chapter would be exposing the truth about equalities. Or should I say "Making the unequal become equal." The second chapter would cover replacing facts with theories. The third chapter would be the "Constant" deception. The fourth chapter be " The concept of Mass (A lie)" I could keep going with this.... Let's start by taking a look at the fine structure constant. Did you know it's been around since 1916? A constant derived from other constants. Even the speed of light is incorporated into the fine structure constant. So if one of those constants is shown to actually be variable, the fine structure constants value would change as well. I picked the speed of light constant because experimental observations do exist that show the speed of light is not constant. The spectral lines of hydrogen from our own sun are red-shifted. That's a fact. So it appears that the speed of light from our own sun is traveling slower towards us than the speed of light here on earth. That kind of throws a monkey wrench in the speed of light being a constant, which appears to me to be a lie. Here on the earth lightning is due to a displacement of charge. Which doesn't stay that way for very long. It appears that voltage potentials get high enough so that everything behaves as a conductor, and then a discharge condition prevails. Titor says his miniature black holes remain stable by continuously injecting electrons into them. That would indicate a buildup of charge would occur. Eventually in the real world that you and I live in, a discharge will occur. That is part of the real physics that Titor didn't seem to understand. And if your credentials are real, then I am having a bit of difficulty in understanding why you don't understand that Titor's machine is merely just a fictional concept. The Tipler sinusoid drawing is what you must be referring to as the schematic. Something he borrowed to tell his story. But if you ever do come up with any "Facts" to defend Titor's story, I would love to see them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
John Titor = John Tooker?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top