Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
1
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
John Titor = John Tooker?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sevensixtwo" data-source="post: 53961" data-attributes="member: 3162"><p>I am unfamiliar with most of you criticisms of the theory and unable to discern any concrete principles in your prose. I do know that GR does not conserve energy globally. This is due to a violation Mach's Principle via the lack of background. I have developed a background cosmic time which I call t_\star. This is the analogue of the Latin word chiros whereas the time we used in our theories until recently was the analogue of chronos.</p><p></p><p>My point about lightning was this, if we apply our best theory to the atmosphere (as far as I understand) it says that there will be no large scale build up of charge as each small disturbance quickly equalizes. We know that lightning does occur in Nature so it reasonable to account for the existence of charged black holes in nature. Furthermore, physicists say the reason that charged BHs don't occur is due to the principle of "cosmic censorship." That is a joke because if charged spinning BHs are the key to hyper-dimensional technology then surely censorship would have played a role in the dissemination and development of the theory.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sevensixtwo, post: 53961, member: 3162"] I am unfamiliar with most of you criticisms of the theory and unable to discern any concrete principles in your prose. I do know that GR does not conserve energy globally. This is due to a violation Mach's Principle via the lack of background. I have developed a background cosmic time which I call t_\star. This is the analogue of the Latin word chiros whereas the time we used in our theories until recently was the analogue of chronos. My point about lightning was this, if we apply our best theory to the atmosphere (as far as I understand) it says that there will be no large scale build up of charge as each small disturbance quickly equalizes. We know that lightning does occur in Nature so it reasonable to account for the existence of charged black holes in nature. Furthermore, physicists say the reason that charged BHs don't occur is due to the principle of "cosmic censorship." That is a joke because if charged spinning BHs are the key to hyper-dimensional technology then surely censorship would have played a role in the dissemination and development of the theory. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
John Titor = John Tooker?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top