Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
John Titor: Real Time Traveler or a Hoaxer?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Apogee" data-source="post: 29293" data-attributes="member: 600"><p><strong>Re: John Titor Debate!</strong></p><p></p><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Passive_Extremist\")</div></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Wasn't trying to discredit your claims as paranoia, just wondering why you asked me what my 'agenda' was. That's what struck me as a bit paranoid.</p><p> </p><p>Besides, not to worry, I know something of the nature of paranoia myself. A word of explantion: I'm one of the original 'conspiracy junkies,' you see.</p><p>On the subject of the the JFK assasination, for example, there was little written matter that I'd not read on the subject and I spent many years absolutely certain that the official explanation of the Warren Commision was so much fiction.</p><p> </p><p>I believed at one time or other that it was the CIA that had been responsible. Later, depending on what theory I was reading, the Mafia seemed more likely, or the Cubans, or French Mercenaries or the Military Industrial complex or Johnson, or Jackie or the Pope... </p><p> </p><p>Each theory seemed on the face of it entirely plausible. One thing was certain though, Oswald probably did not do the shooting and even if he did he had not acted alone.</p><p> </p><p>So I cannot be described as obediant or someone who swallows the official version of news events unquestioningly.</p><p> </p><p>But as I've got older, and my reading and learning continues, I've left my conspiracy junkyism behind...the ideas and the supposed facts that supported it have all fell by the wayside until the only 'credible' answer is the one that people might have been happy with originally had it not been for human error and false assumptions.</p><p> </p><p>So I've come to believe solidly in two things...</p><p> </p><p>Firstly that the complexities of human nature, our capacity for screw-ups and the kind of dis-trust in government that the JFK assasination wrought - has created a generation who see too many shadows. Sometimes a spade is just a spade. Sometimes governments aren't all-calculating, they're just made up of dumb people who make mistakes and try to cover their asses. </p><p> </p><p>And secondly....Lee Harvey Oswald did it and he did it alone. </p><p> </p><p>So I don't believe everything I read anymore. But sometimes, believe it or not, the first version of a story can in fact be the correct one.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Apogee, post: 29293, member: 600"] [b]Re: John Titor Debate![/b] <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Passive_Extremist\")</div> Wasn't trying to discredit your claims as paranoia, just wondering why you asked me what my 'agenda' was. That's what struck me as a bit paranoid. Besides, not to worry, I know something of the nature of paranoia myself. A word of explantion: I'm one of the original 'conspiracy junkies,' you see. On the subject of the the JFK assasination, for example, there was little written matter that I'd not read on the subject and I spent many years absolutely certain that the official explanation of the Warren Commision was so much fiction. I believed at one time or other that it was the CIA that had been responsible. Later, depending on what theory I was reading, the Mafia seemed more likely, or the Cubans, or French Mercenaries or the Military Industrial complex or Johnson, or Jackie or the Pope... Each theory seemed on the face of it entirely plausible. One thing was certain though, Oswald probably did not do the shooting and even if he did he had not acted alone. So I cannot be described as obediant or someone who swallows the official version of news events unquestioningly. But as I've got older, and my reading and learning continues, I've left my conspiracy junkyism behind...the ideas and the supposed facts that supported it have all fell by the wayside until the only 'credible' answer is the one that people might have been happy with originally had it not been for human error and false assumptions. So I've come to believe solidly in two things... Firstly that the complexities of human nature, our capacity for screw-ups and the kind of dis-trust in government that the JFK assasination wrought - has created a generation who see too many shadows. Sometimes a spade is just a spade. Sometimes governments aren't all-calculating, they're just made up of dumb people who make mistakes and try to cover their asses. And secondly....Lee Harvey Oswald did it and he did it alone. So I don't believe everything I read anymore. But sometimes, believe it or not, the first version of a story can in fact be the correct one. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
John Titor: Real Time Traveler or a Hoaxer?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top