Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Kerry's flip flops
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Unintentional" data-source="post: 6452" data-attributes="member: 22"><p><strong>Kerry's flip flops</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I totally respect that. I will be voting for the libertarian candidate or failing that I will vote for Bush. I don't like people who say a vote for a third party candidate is throwing away your vote. If my vote for the libertarian candidate makes Bush loose this election, I guess maybe he should have a meeting the libertarian party. Ditto for the democrats complaining about Nader. If people voting for Nader make Kerry loose, then maybe the democrats need to adopt some of the things Nader wants.</p><p></p><p>I think it is totally arrogant when a party assumes if your choice was limited to two choices they would get your voted especially when it is those two choices (self deemed the only two choices) who are limiting your choice. Screw them!!</p><p></p><p>It's like this:</p><p>Democrat speaking, "Ralph Nader? He has ideas and issues that we don't have? People would rather vote for him than us? That should not be allowed! People should not be allowed to vote for him!"</p><p></p><p>As far as GWB being the annointed republican nominee, it was definitely a smoke filled back room decision. I am sure they thought with 2000 being so close an election, if he was opposed in the primaries, he would loose for sure (in the general election because a rough primary brought his popularity down). Still anyone could have opposed him, but none chose too. They might have chosen not to because GWB decides who get money for their campaigns or they might have thought GWB was too popular when it was time to decide to throw your hat in the ring.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Unintentional, post: 6452, member: 22"] [b]Kerry's flip flops[/b] I totally respect that. I will be voting for the libertarian candidate or failing that I will vote for Bush. I don't like people who say a vote for a third party candidate is throwing away your vote. If my vote for the libertarian candidate makes Bush loose this election, I guess maybe he should have a meeting the libertarian party. Ditto for the democrats complaining about Nader. If people voting for Nader make Kerry loose, then maybe the democrats need to adopt some of the things Nader wants. I think it is totally arrogant when a party assumes if your choice was limited to two choices they would get your voted especially when it is those two choices (self deemed the only two choices) who are limiting your choice. Screw them!! It's like this: Democrat speaking, "Ralph Nader? He has ideas and issues that we don't have? People would rather vote for him than us? That should not be allowed! People should not be allowed to vote for him!" As far as GWB being the annointed republican nominee, it was definitely a smoke filled back room decision. I am sure they thought with 2000 being so close an election, if he was opposed in the primaries, he would loose for sure (in the general election because a rough primary brought his popularity down). Still anyone could have opposed him, but none chose too. They might have chosen not to because GWB decides who get money for their campaigns or they might have thought GWB was too popular when it was time to decide to throw your hat in the ring. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Kerry's flip flops
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top