Sanyam Deshi
Junior Member
- Messages
- 100
@Ren
You have repeatedly called people ignorant for not researching this Azizus story, yet you refuse to address the exact same ignorance you possess by automatically believing everything you read.
But the story of Azizus fits in so well and makes so much sense in terms of the events of the Bible, you say? It could have easily been written this way based off of the Bible. Do you know what the easiest kind of argument to make is? One where the evidence cannot actually ever be presented.
But I have never actually researched it, so I can never understand the superior quality of this writing, you say? As I have said before, regardless of what the writing says, it will never make the information any more or less valid. The fact of the matter is that the story of Azizus could have easily been written yesterday. There are plenty of writers in the world who are capable of making realistic sounding writings that incorporate writings that have preceded them. Plenty of people could have written a piece of fiction like this. It's easily done.
As I have said numerous times in the past, I am fine if you believe this. My problem is that you have this entitled attitude like this Azizus character must be true because of how well it fits in. This just goes to show how naive you are. You do not seem to understand the many brilliant writers that there have been in the past to have made fiction seem like fact. You do not seem to understand the many instances of convincing propaganda created that have swayed entire nation's opinions when the propaganda was built on a foundation of lies. I can neither prove nor disprove Azizus, but the same applies to you. When all is said and done, the quality of writing does not always correspond to the validity.
You have repeatedly called people ignorant for not researching this Azizus story, yet you refuse to address the exact same ignorance you possess by automatically believing everything you read.
But the story of Azizus fits in so well and makes so much sense in terms of the events of the Bible, you say? It could have easily been written this way based off of the Bible. Do you know what the easiest kind of argument to make is? One where the evidence cannot actually ever be presented.
But I have never actually researched it, so I can never understand the superior quality of this writing, you say? As I have said before, regardless of what the writing says, it will never make the information any more or less valid. The fact of the matter is that the story of Azizus could have easily been written yesterday. There are plenty of writers in the world who are capable of making realistic sounding writings that incorporate writings that have preceded them. Plenty of people could have written a piece of fiction like this. It's easily done.
As I have said numerous times in the past, I am fine if you believe this. My problem is that you have this entitled attitude like this Azizus character must be true because of how well it fits in. This just goes to show how naive you are. You do not seem to understand the many brilliant writers that there have been in the past to have made fiction seem like fact. You do not seem to understand the many instances of convincing propaganda created that have swayed entire nation's opinions when the propaganda was built on a foundation of lies. I can neither prove nor disprove Azizus, but the same applies to you. When all is said and done, the quality of writing does not always correspond to the validity.