🚨 Confirmed Hoax My name is Henry Chatterton and I'm a time traveler.

Status
Not open for further replies.
dh1 said:
Well since I am thoroughly convinced of LordHenry's legitimacy due to the information he has given that dovetails what I have recieved from others as well as evidence of my own experiments I have to now assume you guys are not qualified at all to determine who is legitimate and who's not.

Seems like you have to have real knowledge of time travel devices in order to get the full benefit of this site.

I'm going to evaluate all the 'debunked' time traveler threads here due to my newly found lack of faith in everyone's judgement here.

If anything most of the 'debunked' claims should be redefined as 'inconclusive' as a basic fairness.
Click to expand...

Who the hell do you think you are?!?! :ROFLMAO:.
Every posting you have ever made about time-travel has been nothing but unprovable lists of Science-Fiction :LOL:.
And as for "evidence" of your own experiments, you have shown us absolutely nothing, and you have only ever given us excuses after excuses for NOT displaying that evidence:XD:...I can safely say that you wouldnt know one end of a soldering iron from its other end :D..
It is your right to believe what you want to believe, but dont think for one moment that your posting which contains just a few lines, is going to convince many members on here about the legitimacy of Lord Henry Haw Haw :whistle: :D
 
Last edited:
dh1 said:
Well since I am thoroughly convinced of LordHenry's legitimacy due to the information he has given that dovetails what I have recieved from others as well as evidence of my own experiments I have to now assume you guys are not qualified at all to determine who is legitimate and who's not.

Seems like you have to have real knowledge of working time travel devices in order to get the full benefit of this site.

I'm going to evaluate all the 'debunked' time traveler threads here due to my newly found lack of faith in everyone's judgement here.

If anything most of the 'debunked' claims should be redefined as 'inconclusive'.

To be fair, to have real information about working time machines is pretty rare. To understand how they work is even more unusual and of course understanding enough to custom make one is almost unheard of.

Once someone understands the basics of how they all work, then you're qualified to determine who's legitimate or not based on how they describe their technology. You won't understand everyone's technology but enough. Electricity only works one way but you get extremely varied ways of producing and utilizing it.
Click to expand...

All you have is belief. Belief wont conjure a time machine into existence. I don't see anyone other than myself bringing fact based science to the table. But go ahead with your Pringles time machine belief.
 
dh1 said:
Well since I am thoroughly convinced of LordHenry's legitimacy due to the information he has given that dovetails what I have recieved from others as well as evidence of my own experiments I have to now assume you guys are not qualified at all to determine who is legitimate and who's not.

Seems like you have to have real knowledge of working time travel devices in order to get the full benefit of this site.

I'm going to evaluate all the 'debunked' time traveler threads here due to my newly found lack of faith in everyone's judgement here.

If anything most of the 'debunked' claims should be redefined as 'inconclusive'.

To be fair, to have real information about working time machines is pretty rare. To understand how they work is even more unusual and of course understanding enough to custom make one is almost unheard of.

Once someone understands the basics of how they all work, then you're qualified to determine who's legitimate or not based on how they describe their technology. You won't understand everyone's technology but enough. Electricity only works one way but you get extremely varied ways of producing and utilizing it.
Click to expand...
There is not one piece of evidence or anything that makes the least bit of sense. It is one thing to believe something that is backed up with proof, but to blindly believe something purely on faith is unscientific and crazy in this context.
 
dh1 said:
well I figured it out...others schooled in the same reference material can do the same.
Click to expand...
I was schooled to only believe things with evidence... I know you are some time travelling super genius and all, but please excuse us mere mortals if we ask questions and don't accept everything we are told and take it at face value without any proof..
 
dh1 said:
well I figured it out...others schooled in the same reference material can do the same.
Click to expand...

Iam certain those "shools" that you was schooled in were closed due to gross incompetence..and as for those types of movies they are not representative of reality, and thats where you fail miserably, you believe too much in fantasy and not reality :XD:
 
Einstein said:
I don't see anyone other than myself bringing fact based science to the table. But go ahead with your Pringles time machine belief.
Click to expand...
You bring science to the table chap? You can't recognise the components in a radio. I suspect what you know about science can be written on the back of a torn stamp.
 
Just to let others know I'll be shortly leaving this era, for pastures new. So if you've got any questions that need answering get them in now, rather than squabble between each other. Once I'm gone I'm gone and you'll have to wait 100 years if you're still around to hear from me again.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top