Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Discussion Forum
General Discussion
OUTRAGE: New in Town > Famished > Forget to pay $5 for sandwich > 1 day in custody > AWESOME
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Whitelight" data-source="post: 47686" data-attributes="member: 636"><p>I have some insight on this as this woman frequents baby/pregnancy forums and I am a member of one. We discussed this on our forum as she posted about this on another forum called babycentre. She deleted her post on babycentre but we were able to dig up the original through internet archives.</p><p></p><p>Her story doesn't make sense, she states she paid her groceries with WIC and according to others WIC would not have covered those sandwhiches (I'm in Canada so I don't understand it completely). She also had the wrappers at the bottom of the stroller, almost as if they were hidden. When it comes down to it, every single person caught stealing says they were going to pay and forgot. No one ever admits they stole it. She should have paid for it, no matter how hungry she was, before she ate the goods. She commited theft and that's why they were arrested.</p><p></p><p>The store has their policies, whether she was pregnant or had a child with her or not. She stole because she left the store without paying for the goods she consumed. It seems harsh when you look at it, but when you think about all the details the stores actions start looking a lot more reasonable.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Whitelight, post: 47686, member: 636"] I have some insight on this as this woman frequents baby/pregnancy forums and I am a member of one. We discussed this on our forum as she posted about this on another forum called babycentre. She deleted her post on babycentre but we were able to dig up the original through internet archives. Her story doesn't make sense, she states she paid her groceries with WIC and according to others WIC would not have covered those sandwhiches (I'm in Canada so I don't understand it completely). She also had the wrappers at the bottom of the stroller, almost as if they were hidden. When it comes down to it, every single person caught stealing says they were going to pay and forgot. No one ever admits they stole it. She should have paid for it, no matter how hungry she was, before she ate the goods. She commited theft and that's why they were arrested. The store has their policies, whether she was pregnant or had a child with her or not. She stole because she left the store without paying for the goods she consumed. It seems harsh when you look at it, but when you think about all the details the stores actions start looking a lot more reasonable. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussion Forum
General Discussion
OUTRAGE: New in Town > Famished > Forget to pay $5 for sandwich > 1 day in custody > AWESOME
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top