I should have clarified. Time paradoxes as a physical thing cannot exist. And are always a linguistic and fictional error.
Paradoxes are a thing. Here's one.
This sentence is false.
Harte
A linguistic error. Yes. Those are a thing. But you have not described anything physical. Something false cannot be true, and vice versa.
You can save money by spending it.
This is false. By decreasing the amount of money you have, you have not retained the amount, nor increased it.
I know one thing; that I know nothing.
Again, false. If you know one thing, that is not nothing.
This is the beginning of the end.
Not a paradox. "The end" can be a period of time. The beginning of such could be labeled as the beginning. For example, 1,2,3,4,5 is our sequence. If we say the end is 3-5, then 3 would be the beginning of the end.
Deep down, you're really shallow.
Just a figure of speech. Not a paradox.
Compulsive liars sometimes say the truth. Likewise, someone can lie without being a compulsive liar. Not a paradox.
“Men work together whether they work together or apart.” - Robert Frost
Not a paradox. "Together" in the first sense has a different definition compared to the later use.
"What a pity that youth must be wasted on the young." - George Bernard Shaw
Being chronologically young vs having a youthful body are two separate things and are not paradoxical or contradictory. You can be old and have a youthful body.
"I can resist anything but temptation." - Oscar Wilde
Again not a paradox. There are other things you can't resist, but upon being tempted you can't resist. Either way, more linguistic games and nothing based in reality.
Here are the rules: Ignore all rules.
Just more linguistic impossibilities. Again, nothing based in reality.
The second sentence is false. The first sentence is true.
Just more linguistic garbage. I can easily say: "this sentence is both true and false." and ultimately it means nothing. None of these things have a basis in reality.