Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Pattern? maybe civil unrest, proof?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Judge Bean" data-source="post: 13203" data-attributes="member: 42"><p><strong>Pattern? maybe civil unrest, proof?</strong></p><p></p><p>I still don't get the Parting of the Sea analogy. Is it the Egyptians who are to be surprised by the huge disaster, or those who follow Moses who doubted his powers? Moses <em>himself </em>was apparently taken by surprise at the event, too.</p><p></p><p>How does all of it relate to urban Americans in 2012? We can't tell at this point just <em>what </em>might surprise us then, or them there. Was Titor referring to nuclear holocaust? He seems to have been talking about two different surprises: One, the big surprise for those in the city, which apparently can be avoided, and, Two, the fact that so many millions stayed in the city.</p><p></p><p>It works out to gibberish. He doesn't want to go into any more detail when pressed for crucial <em>probative </em>information-- that is, you might be able to test him against his predictions if he gave you too much more detail, so he begs off with a stupid rule about not wanting to ruin a surprise. This has been taken as a kind of Gospel rhetorical ploy (e.g., "I can't tell you all that I might, for your little brains couldn't take it."), but we shouldn't allow it fool us. If it's that obvious that you ought to evacuate, his talk of "surprises" is mightily empty.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Judge Bean, post: 13203, member: 42"] [b]Pattern? maybe civil unrest, proof?[/b] I still don't get the Parting of the Sea analogy. Is it the Egyptians who are to be surprised by the huge disaster, or those who follow Moses who doubted his powers? Moses [i]himself [/i]was apparently taken by surprise at the event, too. How does all of it relate to urban Americans in 2012? We can't tell at this point just [i]what [/i]might surprise us then, or them there. Was Titor referring to nuclear holocaust? He seems to have been talking about two different surprises: One, the big surprise for those in the city, which apparently can be avoided, and, Two, the fact that so many millions stayed in the city. It works out to gibberish. He doesn't want to go into any more detail when pressed for crucial [i]probative [/i]information-- that is, you might be able to test him against his predictions if he gave you too much more detail, so he begs off with a stupid rule about not wanting to ruin a surprise. This has been taken as a kind of Gospel rhetorical ploy (e.g., "I can't tell you all that I might, for your little brains couldn't take it."), but we shouldn't allow it fool us. If it's that obvious that you ought to evacuate, his talk of "surprises" is mightily empty. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Pattern? maybe civil unrest, proof?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top