Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
People talking of splitting USA (red-blue map)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Judge Bean" data-source="post: 12560" data-attributes="member: 42"><p><strong>People talking of splitting USA (red-blue map)</strong></p><p></p><p>I suggest a website dedicated to the Constitutional Amendment. Its exact text can be composed as a group effort rather easily, and voted on on the site without the need for convention or meeting.</p><p></p><p>Once the text of the Amendment is drafted (which calls for a national referendum of general impeachment, or "total recall," thanks to the inspiration of Arnie's election here) it can be walked around by volunteers in the various States.</p><p></p><p>That is one part of the effort required, and is meant to build a consensus. The other part will be the attempt to convince <em>both </em>the Congress <em>and </em>the legislatures of two-thirds of the States to adopt the Amendment. <em>Either </em>two-thirds of both houses of the Congress or two-thirds of the States must accept the new law (which must then be ratified by three quarters of the States), but the idea would be to demonstrate the public will by trying <em>both</em>.</p><p></p><p>Despite the monumental character of the undertaking, it has the virtue of simplicity. I think you can see that the U.S. Congress will not by any stretch approve of its own dismissal and replacement. However, if there is sufficient popular support, they would not dare oppose it, and would try to impose term limits or some such hogwash to avoid their fate.</p><p></p><p>Finally, if the Amendment is ratified, the actual recall election would take place, in which candidates for Congress and the presidency and vice-presidency would be elected to replace the evicted ones. The new elected officials would then appoint a new Supreme Court. None of the new leaders are permitted to have previously held positions at the same top level of the three branches, and spending caps would be put on their campaign efforts. The campaigns wouldn't have much time to amount to much anyway.</p><p></p><p>It's Us vs. Them, and the new Them would be under our Thumbs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Judge Bean, post: 12560, member: 42"] [b]People talking of splitting USA (red-blue map)[/b] I suggest a website dedicated to the Constitutional Amendment. Its exact text can be composed as a group effort rather easily, and voted on on the site without the need for convention or meeting. Once the text of the Amendment is drafted (which calls for a national referendum of general impeachment, or "total recall," thanks to the inspiration of Arnie's election here) it can be walked around by volunteers in the various States. That is one part of the effort required, and is meant to build a consensus. The other part will be the attempt to convince [i]both [/i]the Congress [i]and [/i]the legislatures of two-thirds of the States to adopt the Amendment. [i]Either [/i]two-thirds of both houses of the Congress or two-thirds of the States must accept the new law (which must then be ratified by three quarters of the States), but the idea would be to demonstrate the public will by trying [i]both[/i]. Despite the monumental character of the undertaking, it has the virtue of simplicity. I think you can see that the U.S. Congress will not by any stretch approve of its own dismissal and replacement. However, if there is sufficient popular support, they would not dare oppose it, and would try to impose term limits or some such hogwash to avoid their fate. Finally, if the Amendment is ratified, the actual recall election would take place, in which candidates for Congress and the presidency and vice-presidency would be elected to replace the evicted ones. The new elected officials would then appoint a new Supreme Court. None of the new leaders are permitted to have previously held positions at the same top level of the three branches, and spending caps would be put on their campaign efforts. The campaigns wouldn't have much time to amount to much anyway. It's Us vs. Them, and the new Them would be under our Thumbs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
People talking of splitting USA (red-blue map)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top