Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Discussion Forum
General Discussion
Scott Peterson Case
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Judge Bean" data-source="post: 13485" data-attributes="member: 42"><p><strong>Scott Peterson Case</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I just thank my lucky stars it wasn't <em>me </em>in his shoes. I can't <em>remember </em>all of the times <em>I've </em>gone out fishing for sturgeon midmorning in the rain in San Francisco Bay, without bait, with a two-day old fishing license and brandnew boat, on Christmas while my pregnant wife is home walking the dog! Whew-- I dodged a bullet on that one, I tell you.</p><p></p><p>Peterson's folks apparently paid the enormous legal bills-- probably half a million before trial even started. There will be a public cost that continues with the appeal, which could take more than a decade if he gets the death penalty. It has already cost the taxpayers a couple of million.</p><p></p><p>The case was almost totally "circumstantial," which, under California law, means that the jury <em>must </em>find the defendant not guilty if there is an alternative, reasonable explanation of the evidence that exonerates him. So the jury apparently decided that the innocent interpretation was either unreasonable or didn't adequately explain everything.</p><p></p><p>He may not have been guilty in some other terms, but he was at least a moron willing to sacrifice the love of a beautiful woman.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Judge Bean, post: 13485, member: 42"] [b]Scott Peterson Case[/b] I just thank my lucky stars it wasn't [i]me [/i]in his shoes. I can't [i]remember [/i]all of the times [i]I've [/i]gone out fishing for sturgeon midmorning in the rain in San Francisco Bay, without bait, with a two-day old fishing license and brandnew boat, on Christmas while my pregnant wife is home walking the dog! Whew-- I dodged a bullet on that one, I tell you. Peterson's folks apparently paid the enormous legal bills-- probably half a million before trial even started. There will be a public cost that continues with the appeal, which could take more than a decade if he gets the death penalty. It has already cost the taxpayers a couple of million. The case was almost totally "circumstantial," which, under California law, means that the jury [i]must [/i]find the defendant not guilty if there is an alternative, reasonable explanation of the evidence that exonerates him. So the jury apparently decided that the innocent interpretation was either unreasonable or didn't adequately explain everything. He may not have been guilty in some other terms, but he was at least a moron willing to sacrifice the love of a beautiful woman. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussion Forum
General Discussion
Scott Peterson Case
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top