Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Should we change events if we have the abilty to time travel?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dimension-1hacker" data-source="post: 187109" data-attributes="member: 11791"><p>You are saying consciousness is the blueprint for what can and cannot exist, and the cause for the effect dimensions. I am not in the correct mental state to think about anything complex at the moment. I am not at the point of understanding conceptually why observation causes the observed to exist, sorry. I soon will be, most important: deep breathing exersizes, myfacial stimulation, pressure point stimulation, hiit cardio, stretching yoga is needed. A year or two ago a accidently stumbled appon a method of boosting my intellegence level to the level of understanding of philosophy, how to understand, and concepts, and more, and computation of a supercomputer, to become conscious. Think flowers for Algernon, but without the surgery without no reversal method.</p><p></p><p>also, some of my subjective reasons for wanting to exist is to learn and understand concepts, explore space, and a goal is to patent the concepts I thought of, way to manufacturer nanobots and a type of spacecraft that can travel close to the speed of light that is powered by the sun or a nuclear reactor, and a battery that uses empty space to store electrons.</p><p></p><p>Without a reason to exist something cannot exist. Therefore without the reason having a reason and so on nothing has a cause. Anything can be a cause but reason or blue print is what causes a cause to be itself; a cause of cause.</p><p></p><p>Objects could be contained by a different substance or lines, forced to be different, up down left right ways for these objects move. No space in-between substances. These objects by definition are separate from the substance surrounds it. If everything is base and cannot be divided into an infinite amount of smaller parts, because every object cannot move itself, the substance surrounding the other substance has no distance to move to cause the surrounded substance to move. To move the third substance abstractly exists to insite the other two substances to never stop moving.</p><p></p><p>why is the objects visually needed to accurately describe it? The object was being described as needed to exist but not what it looks like. I need to describe what the object looks like because without doing that I only describe what it can do not the description of its process. visual is observing the cause and effect, and thinking about is storing the storing the observation? If thought is the stored observation what am I storing. The observation which is a thing, and a thing are two forces moving. what is a force but a movement and an object. what is an object? dimensions. what causes me to think that thought dimensions? itself? are thoughts the third force, the explination for the why, the blueprint? why, dimensions are self explanitory, and if thoughts are stored observations, what stores the observations, how can I recognize how I am stored? how can I recognize how to recognize?</p><p></p><p>Two causes to move. One cause to facilitate movement. Existing in a medium of existence.</p><p>A canvas being painted on.</p><p>12 on 3.</p><p></p><p>Is life the opposite of the construct? wouldn't consciousness be the one because it has properties or parts depending on the type?</p><p></p><p>I think I was describing what I think is required for existence abstractly, not the in abstract properties of it. I wonder if you are one of my future selves?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dimension-1hacker, post: 187109, member: 11791"] You are saying consciousness is the blueprint for what can and cannot exist, and the cause for the effect dimensions. I am not in the correct mental state to think about anything complex at the moment. I am not at the point of understanding conceptually why observation causes the observed to exist, sorry. I soon will be, most important: deep breathing exersizes, myfacial stimulation, pressure point stimulation, hiit cardio, stretching yoga is needed. A year or two ago a accidently stumbled appon a method of boosting my intellegence level to the level of understanding of philosophy, how to understand, and concepts, and more, and computation of a supercomputer, to become conscious. Think flowers for Algernon, but without the surgery without no reversal method. also, some of my subjective reasons for wanting to exist is to learn and understand concepts, explore space, and a goal is to patent the concepts I thought of, way to manufacturer nanobots and a type of spacecraft that can travel close to the speed of light that is powered by the sun or a nuclear reactor, and a battery that uses empty space to store electrons. Without a reason to exist something cannot exist. Therefore without the reason having a reason and so on nothing has a cause. Anything can be a cause but reason or blue print is what causes a cause to be itself; a cause of cause. Objects could be contained by a different substance or lines, forced to be different, up down left right ways for these objects move. No space in-between substances. These objects by definition are separate from the substance surrounds it. If everything is base and cannot be divided into an infinite amount of smaller parts, because every object cannot move itself, the substance surrounding the other substance has no distance to move to cause the surrounded substance to move. To move the third substance abstractly exists to insite the other two substances to never stop moving. why is the objects visually needed to accurately describe it? The object was being described as needed to exist but not what it looks like. I need to describe what the object looks like because without doing that I only describe what it can do not the description of its process. visual is observing the cause and effect, and thinking about is storing the storing the observation? If thought is the stored observation what am I storing. The observation which is a thing, and a thing are two forces moving. what is a force but a movement and an object. what is an object? dimensions. what causes me to think that thought dimensions? itself? are thoughts the third force, the explination for the why, the blueprint? why, dimensions are self explanitory, and if thoughts are stored observations, what stores the observations, how can I recognize how I am stored? how can I recognize how to recognize? Two causes to move. One cause to facilitate movement. Existing in a medium of existence. A canvas being painted on. 12 on 3. Is life the opposite of the construct? wouldn't consciousness be the one because it has properties or parts depending on the type? I think I was describing what I think is required for existence abstractly, not the in abstract properties of it. I wonder if you are one of my future selves? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Should we change events if we have the abilty to time travel?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top