Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Social Media Fact-Checking and Account Bans Could Be Slippery Slope to Censorship
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OakFieldAlienz444" data-source="post: 207320" data-attributes="member: 12609"><p>Truth---in and of itself is sometimes subjective and open to interpretation. The whole notion of "fact checking" always weirded me out a bit. I mean I get it in theory but it's not like some people are "qualified arbiters of truth" and others are not. That doesn't even really make sense.</p><p>One person says something: Oh he's qualified it must be true. Another guy says something: oh he must be wrong cuz he didn't have the badge?</p><p></p><p></p><p>This kind of society is doomed to fail because no one will trust anyone. There will always be people who don't trust "fact checkers" and there will always be people who don't trust "alternative truthers"</p><p></p><p>Both sides are often proven wrong. This will all result in chaos.</p><p>Do they really think that by using the exact same people that conspiracy theorists do not trust at all</p><p>to disprove stuff that that will convince them they're wrong?</p><p></p><p>Oh this guy who you think is in the Illuminati says you're wrong so you gotta believe him.</p><p></p><p>Brush your teeth kids.</p><p></p><p>That kind of mentality doesn't really click with a lot of people and I understand why no one wants </p><p>to be treated like a child</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OakFieldAlienz444, post: 207320, member: 12609"] Truth---in and of itself is sometimes subjective and open to interpretation. The whole notion of "fact checking" always weirded me out a bit. I mean I get it in theory but it's not like some people are "qualified arbiters of truth" and others are not. That doesn't even really make sense. One person says something: Oh he's qualified it must be true. Another guy says something: oh he must be wrong cuz he didn't have the badge? This kind of society is doomed to fail because no one will trust anyone. There will always be people who don't trust "fact checkers" and there will always be people who don't trust "alternative truthers" Both sides are often proven wrong. This will all result in chaos. Do they really think that by using the exact same people that conspiracy theorists do not trust at all to disprove stuff that that will convince them they're wrong? Oh this guy who you think is in the Illuminati says you're wrong so you gotta believe him. Brush your teeth kids. That kind of mentality doesn't really click with a lot of people and I understand why no one wants to be treated like a child [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Social Media Fact-Checking and Account Bans Could Be Slippery Slope to Censorship
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top