Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Something I noticed about JTs predictions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Judge Bean" data-source="post: 11796" data-attributes="member: 42"><p><strong>Something I noticed about JTs predictions</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I meant that part of the media that is generally recognized as pro-Bush. Most of the news, though, is apolitical-- not because of a considered or conscientious position, but because it is a huge, stupid mechanism that only responds to the flow of cash and the divorces of celebrities.</p><p></p><p>One exception is the Sinclair family, which operates a couple of dozen stations across the country and wants to air the anti-Kerry film. This is a far different thing than the Moore film, which was distributed in theaters according to industry agreements and public taste. TV is considered less a discretionary choice of the public, and the airwaves are regulated as much as, say, shipping and airlines. If you put a political viewpoint on TV, you are required to balance it with access to the opposing opinion-- a point lost on an outfit such as Fox.</p><p></p><p>The polls do favor Bush, but none of them by enough of a spread to make anyone in DC comfortable.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Judge Bean, post: 11796, member: 42"] [b]Something I noticed about JTs predictions[/b] I meant that part of the media that is generally recognized as pro-Bush. Most of the news, though, is apolitical-- not because of a considered or conscientious position, but because it is a huge, stupid mechanism that only responds to the flow of cash and the divorces of celebrities. One exception is the Sinclair family, which operates a couple of dozen stations across the country and wants to air the anti-Kerry film. This is a far different thing than the Moore film, which was distributed in theaters according to industry agreements and public taste. TV is considered less a discretionary choice of the public, and the airwaves are regulated as much as, say, shipping and airlines. If you put a political viewpoint on TV, you are required to balance it with access to the opposing opinion-- a point lost on an outfit such as Fox. The polls do favor Bush, but none of them by enough of a spread to make anyone in DC comfortable. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Something I noticed about JTs predictions
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top