Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Something I noticed about JTs predictions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CaryP" data-source="post: 11809" data-attributes="member: 34"><p><strong>Something I noticed about JTs predictions</strong></p><p></p><p>The electoral college is an example of non-proportional representation. In most states, if not all, whoever gets the most votes gets all of the electoral college votes from that state. That's how Gore had the most popular votes in 2000, but lost the electoral college vote. That's if you believe the Supreme Court didn't hand Bush the election. Proportional voting would give third parties some representation rather than basically none now. The two predominant parties would have to start including the third party candidates rather than ignore them. Parliamentary politics in other countries where a majority can be put together by a grouping of smaller political parties is an example of proportional representation. Is it perfect? No, but it's a start out of the Demopublican/Republicrat one party system we have now. </p><p> </p><p>Cary</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CaryP, post: 11809, member: 34"] [b]Something I noticed about JTs predictions[/b] The electoral college is an example of non-proportional representation. In most states, if not all, whoever gets the most votes gets all of the electoral college votes from that state. That's how Gore had the most popular votes in 2000, but lost the electoral college vote. That's if you believe the Supreme Court didn't hand Bush the election. Proportional voting would give third parties some representation rather than basically none now. The two predominant parties would have to start including the third party candidates rather than ignore them. Parliamentary politics in other countries where a majority can be put together by a grouping of smaller political parties is an example of proportional representation. Is it perfect? No, but it's a start out of the Demopublican/Republicrat one party system we have now. Cary [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Something I noticed about JTs predictions
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top