Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Discussion Forum
General Discussion
Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OakFieldAlienz444" data-source="post: 243590" data-attributes="member: 12609"><p>I've posted this b4 but this is the funniest Jar Jar is actually evil joke:</p><p></p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]k7Uc84U04Sk[/MEDIA]</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And yes it's been confirmed George Lucas was planning on making Jar Jar a "bad guy"</p><p></p><p>from wikipedia:</p><p></p><p>The theory stated that Jar Jar was originally intended to be a manipulative villain, but George Lucas replaced him in Episode II at the last minute with Count Dooku because of Jar Jar's unpopularity. Best would later confirm that this was partially true, as he felt it would have happened without the backlash.</p><h3><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jar_Jar_Binks#:~:text=The%20theory%20stated%20that%20Jar,have%20happened%20without%20the%20backlash." target="_blank">Jar Jar Binks - Wikipedia</a></h3><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/star-wars-the-darth-jar-jar-binks-theory-is-partially-true-says-actor-a6923351.html[/URL]</p><p></p><p>personally I think the backlash would have all dissapeared if they had made Jar Jar a Sith lord.</p><p>The sad truth is that most people prefer bad guy characters, not ALWAYS but at least half</p><p>of the time, and it's because they make them more relatable, you see their frustrations come out more etc</p><p></p><p>Me I just thought Jar Jar was goofy and funny, the prequels were ahead of their time in some ways</p><p>and more in-depth and less plain as day these guys are good and these guys are bad and also </p><p>the admitted anti-Bush propaganda in the third one (yes Bush was not that popular but people didn't want to see politics on Star Wars even though it always was to a more subtle degree) all these things combined to hurt the prequels. No they're not as fun as the originals but they offer more insight psychologically than the other ones did. Which is why it's weird I suppose that such a cartoony character like Jar Jar made it into the more "serious" hardcore Star Wars movies. Yes he can be annoying but he didn't bother me that much personally. It's "Star Wars" for crying out loud and in the first movie you see a LOT of weird annoying space aliens in the New Hope bar scene.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OakFieldAlienz444, post: 243590, member: 12609"] I've posted this b4 but this is the funniest Jar Jar is actually evil joke: [MEDIA=youtube]k7Uc84U04Sk[/MEDIA] And yes it's been confirmed George Lucas was planning on making Jar Jar a "bad guy" from wikipedia: The theory stated that Jar Jar was originally intended to be a manipulative villain, but George Lucas replaced him in Episode II at the last minute with Count Dooku because of Jar Jar's unpopularity. Best would later confirm that this was partially true, as he felt it would have happened without the backlash. [HEADING=2][URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jar_Jar_Binks#:~:text=The%20theory%20stated%20that%20Jar,have%20happened%20without%20the%20backlash.']Jar Jar Binks - Wikipedia[/URL][/HEADING] [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/star-wars-the-darth-jar-jar-binks-theory-is-partially-true-says-actor-a6923351.html[/URL] personally I think the backlash would have all dissapeared if they had made Jar Jar a Sith lord. The sad truth is that most people prefer bad guy characters, not ALWAYS but at least half of the time, and it's because they make them more relatable, you see their frustrations come out more etc Me I just thought Jar Jar was goofy and funny, the prequels were ahead of their time in some ways and more in-depth and less plain as day these guys are good and these guys are bad and also the admitted anti-Bush propaganda in the third one (yes Bush was not that popular but people didn't want to see politics on Star Wars even though it always was to a more subtle degree) all these things combined to hurt the prequels. No they're not as fun as the originals but they offer more insight psychologically than the other ones did. Which is why it's weird I suppose that such a cartoony character like Jar Jar made it into the more "serious" hardcore Star Wars movies. Yes he can be annoying but he didn't bother me that much personally. It's "Star Wars" for crying out loud and in the first movie you see a LOT of weird annoying space aliens in the New Hope bar scene. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussion Forum
General Discussion
Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top