Switching Consciousness to Different Timeline

[8thsinner]

Well that's the problem. We know that quantum stuff behaves in a quantum way, but the observable world behaves according to classic mechanics. Theories like MWI try to explain why that's the case, but there are other theories, too. MWI is an unfalsifiable hypothesis. That doesn't make it wrong of course, just that it can't be proven wrong.

For now perhaps, but now that reality has been proven to be a holographic as of 2022 theres going to be tons of people trying to figure out if localized realities are created by the observer, what is it that makes the rest of reality for lack of a better term construct itself into these so called classical mechanics, and it won't be long before some of them start figuring out that the mandela effect isn't some weird mass hallucination.
Once they figure out that its real, that groups of people have created groups of timelines then they will start looking for the parameters involved and eventually figure out that resonance of belief systems create it, and that that resonance is measurable.

 

[Thelema]

For now perhaps, but now that reality has been proven to be a holographic as of 2022 theres going to be tons of people trying to figure out if localized realities are created by the observer, what is it that makes the rest of reality for lack of a better term construct itself into these so called classical mechanics, and it won't be long before some of them start figuring out that the mandela effect isn't some weird mass hallucination.
Once they figure out that its real, that groups of people have created groups of timelines then they will start looking for the parameters involved and eventually figure out that resonance of belief systems create it, and that that resonance is measurable.

It's not exactly that reality has been proven to be a holographic. In 2022, some researchers won the Nobel Prize because they proved that the universe can't be both local and real. Local means that everything is influenced only by phenomena in their spacial or temporal proximity. Real means that that objects have properties even when they aren't being interacted with (e.g. your desk is "hard" even when you aren't touching it.)

It didn't prove that the universe is not real or not local, only that it can't be both local and real. It can be local or it can be real, but not both.

Edit: It's important to note that in this context, the opposite of "real" is not "fake." In other words, from the quantum physics perspective, if the universe was "not real" it doesn't mean that the universe is a simulation or anything like that. Just that objects don't have defined properties from their creation.

 

[Einstein]

It's not exactly that reality has been proven to be a holographic. In 2022, some researchers won the Nobel Prize because they proved that the universe can't be both local and real. Local means that everything is influenced only by phenomena in their spacial or temporal proximity. Real means that that objects have properties even when they aren't being interacted with (e.g. your desk is "hard" even when you aren't touching it.)

It didn't prove that the universe is not real or not local, only that it can't be both local and real. It can be local or it can be real, but not both.

Edit: It's important to note that in this context, the opposite of "real" is not "fake." In other words, from the quantum physics perspective, if the universe was "not real" it doesn't mean that the universe is a simulation or anything like that. Just that objects don't have defined properties from their creation.

You must realize that current observations are at odds when trying to make a one size fits all theory. I have to ask, why in hell would you want to conceptualize anything with a theory? The observations could suggest there are at least 2 different types of space. But no one is willing to step forward and point out those facts.

 

[Thelema]

You must realize that current observations are at odds when trying to make a one size fits all theory. I have to ask, why in hell would you want to conceptualize anything with a theory? The observations could suggest there are at least 2 different types of space. But no one is willing to step forward and point out those facts.

I totally agree, there isn't one clear theory that explains this. But trying to find one is definitely a good idea. It can help develop practical technologies, which could be amazing. A practical implementation of quantum entanglement could result in instant communication without the need for a huge network infrastructure and that's just for starters.